Re: [xrblock] no meeting at IETF 101 (?)
Qin Wu <bill.wu@huawei.com> Mon, 22 January 2018 10:07 UTC
Return-Path: <bill.wu@huawei.com>
X-Original-To: xrblock@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: xrblock@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4CBC1126DED for <xrblock@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 22 Jan 2018 02:07:59 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.23
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.23 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id cKAnzniS4UeM for <xrblock@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 22 Jan 2018 02:07:56 -0800 (PST)
Received: from huawei.com (lhrrgout.huawei.com [194.213.3.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C1F821243F6 for <xrblock@ietf.org>; Mon, 22 Jan 2018 02:07:55 -0800 (PST)
Received: from LHREML714-CAH.china.huawei.com (unknown [172.18.7.107]) by Forcepoint Email with ESMTP id A868DFC098FE6 for <xrblock@ietf.org>; Mon, 22 Jan 2018 10:07:50 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from NKGEML411-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.98.56.70) by LHREML714-CAH.china.huawei.com (10.201.108.37) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.361.1; Mon, 22 Jan 2018 10:07:52 +0000
Received: from NKGEML513-MBS.china.huawei.com ([169.254.2.231]) by nkgeml411-hub.china.huawei.com ([10.98.56.70]) with mapi id 14.03.0361.001; Mon, 22 Jan 2018 18:07:47 +0800
From: Qin Wu <bill.wu@huawei.com>
To: Dan Romascanu <dromasca@gmail.com>, xrblock <xrblock@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [xrblock] no meeting at IETF 101 (?)
Thread-Index: AQHTkq64F+/Zc4pIV0KDk1OKy/AFm6N/q1Zw
Date: Mon, 22 Jan 2018 10:07:46 +0000
Message-ID: <B8F9A780D330094D99AF023C5877DABA9AD40CC5@nkgeml513-mbs.china.huawei.com>
References: <CAFgnS4WpSVb8TybG+5ttowsxYc7zo2aqGVbg4TfXPJkNcfJ5PQ@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAFgnS4WpSVb8TybG+5ttowsxYc7zo2aqGVbg4TfXPJkNcfJ5PQ@mail.gmail.com>
Accept-Language: zh-CN, en-US
Content-Language: zh-CN
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.136.79.67]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_B8F9A780D330094D99AF023C5877DABA9AD40CC5nkgeml513mbschi_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/xrblock/TYzuQ1AZk9Jr2gS2lOUvChPcUWE>
Subject: Re: [xrblock] no meeting at IETF 101 (?)
X-BeenThere: xrblock@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: Metric Blocks for use with RTCP's Extended Report Framework working group discussion list <xrblock.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/xrblock>, <mailto:xrblock-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/xrblock/>
List-Post: <mailto:xrblock@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:xrblock-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/xrblock>, <mailto:xrblock-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 22 Jan 2018 10:07:59 -0000
Hi, Dan: Effective loss index draft worth being discussed. In IETF 100 Singapore meeting, I presented this draft in avtcore session on behalf of other co-authors, We got quite a lot of supports in avtcore, also we don’t see any major issue with this. I am wondering whether we need to discuss this work again in IETF 101 and we just directly request call for adoption in XRBLOCK, sorry for late request for this. BTW: we are working on another update of this draft and will post soon. -Qin 发件人: xrblock [mailto:xrblock-bounces@ietf.org] 代表 Dan Romascanu 发送时间: 2018年1月21日 19:55 收件人: xrblock 主题: [xrblock] no meeting at IETF 101 (?) Hi, There has been little activity lately on the mail list, and I am not aware about any new proposals. It does not seem that there is any need for xrblock to meet at IETF 101. Please let know the WG mail list of any other opinions before Monday 1/29. If there are no requests or comments I will push the 'no meeting' button. Thanks and Regards, Dan
- [xrblock] no meeting at IETF 101 (?) Dan Romascanu
- Re: [xrblock] no meeting at IETF 101 (?) Huangyihong (Rachel)
- Re: [xrblock] no meeting at IETF 101 (?) Dan Romascanu
- Re: [xrblock] no meeting at IETF 101 (?) Huangyihong (Rachel)
- Re: [xrblock] no meeting at IETF 101 (?) Dan Romascanu
- Re: [xrblock] no meeting at IETF 101 (?) Huangyihong (Rachel)
- Re: [xrblock] no meeting at IETF 101 (?) Qin Wu
- Re: [xrblock] no meeting at IETF 101 (?) Roni Even (A)