[xrblock] Fw: I-D Action: draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-discard-05.txt

Qin Wu <bill.wu@huawei.com> Tue, 10 July 2012 12:21 UTC

Return-Path: <bill.wu@huawei.com>
X-Original-To: xrblock@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: xrblock@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D8EAE21F875C for <xrblock@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 10 Jul 2012 05:21:51 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.641
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.641 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.205, BAYES_00=-2.599, MIME_BASE64_TEXT=1.753, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id yXvwvdQDPp57 for <xrblock@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 10 Jul 2012 05:21:51 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from dfwrgout.huawei.com (dfwrgout.huawei.com [206.16.17.72]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 21BBA21F875A for <xrblock@ietf.org>; Tue, 10 Jul 2012 05:21:51 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from 172.18.9.243 (EHLO dfweml202-edg.china.huawei.com) ([172.18.9.243]) by dfwrg02-dlp.huawei.com (MOS 4.2.3-GA FastPath) with ESMTP id AHQ02640; Tue, 10 Jul 2012 08:22:18 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from DFWEML404-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.193.5.203) by dfweml202-edg.china.huawei.com (172.18.9.108) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.1.323.3; Tue, 10 Jul 2012 05:19:31 -0700
Received: from SZXEML401-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.82.67.31) by dfweml404-hub.china.huawei.com (10.193.5.203) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.1.323.3; Tue, 10 Jul 2012 05:19:30 -0700
Received: from w53375 (10.138.41.149) by szxeml401-hub.china.huawei.com (10.82.67.31) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.1.323.3; Tue, 10 Jul 2012 20:19:23 +0800
Message-ID: <D8C720B9E77243D0BE6C58CA45A2A735@china.huawei.com>
From: Qin Wu <bill.wu@huawei.com>
To: xrblock@ietf.org
Date: Tue, 10 Jul 2012 20:19:22 +0800
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.5931
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.6109
X-Originating-IP: [10.138.41.149]
X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected
Subject: [xrblock] Fw: I-D Action: draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-discard-05.txt
X-BeenThere: xrblock@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Metric Blocks for use with RTCP's Extended Report Framework working group discussion list <xrblock.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/xrblock>, <mailto:xrblock-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/xrblock>
List-Post: <mailto:xrblock@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:xrblock-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/xrblock>, <mailto:xrblock-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 10 Jul 2012 12:21:52 -0000

On 10 July , 2012 8:02 PM, Internet-Drafts@ietf.org wrote:

> 
> A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories.
> This draft is a work item of the Metric Blocks for use with RTCP's Extended Report Framework Working Group of the IETF.
> 
> Title           : RTCP XR Report Block for Discard Count metric Reporting
> Author(s)       : Geoff Hunt
>                          Alan Clark
>                          Glen Zorn
>                          Qin Wu
> Filename        : draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-discard-05.txt
> Pages           : 13
> Date            : 2012-07-10
> 
> Abstract:
>   This document defines an RTCP XR Report Block that allows the
>   reporting of a simple discard count metric for use in a range of RTP
>   applications.
> 
> 
> The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is:
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-discard
> 
> There's also a htmlized version available at:
> http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-discard-05
> 
> A diff from previous version is available at:
> http://tools.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-discard-05

[Qin]: One update according to the comments received in the WGLC.
The main change to previous version is based on the recent discussion and agreement on the list with Shida, 
Dan, Alan, Varun and in the section 3.2, definition and description
about Discard Type. Some text is added to clarify how to report each of discard type or combination of 3 discard types.

One remaining issue is raised by Alan, which is about whether we should add some texts to explain 
the causes of duplicated packets discards in the draft.