Re: [xrblock] Pointer to Active Registry Draft and RTCP-XR example metric

Hi Al,

I looked at the IPPM active registry draft and below are my thoughts:

The current rtcp-xr-metrics draft attempts to map the XR metrics to an
API identifier. These API identifiers would be exposed by the browser
to the Javascript application by the WebRTC StatsAPI. Hence, I think a
new registry would make more sense -- listing only the metric identifiers
related to WebRTC and their corresponding definition, data-type, and
measurement interval and value range.

Currently the recommended metrics for WebRTC are a subset of the
metrics defined in XRBLOCK.

The IPPM registry on the other hand imports the RFC6390 template from
each XRBLOCK document, I hope this new registry will eventually list all
the active metrics (not only the ones developed in XRBLOCK), and be a
good source to look for existing metrics before defining new ones.

Cheers,
Varun

On Tue, Jul 22, 2014 at 1:46 PM, MORTON, ALFRED C (AL) <acmorton@att.com> wrote:
> I'd like your feedback on this draft/example, as a co-author.
> It would be fine to post it to the ippm-list, too.
>
> http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-ippm-registry-active/
>
> note that the eventual plan is to combine passive and active registries.
> there are references in the draft above to the common draft, which
> will inherit all the active columns, etc. soon.
>
> Al
> _______________________________________________
> xrblock mailing list
> xrblock@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/xrblock

-- 
http://www.netlab.tkk.fi/~varun/