[xrblock] 答复: Consensus call on splitting the RLE draft to two
Qin Wu <bill.wu@huawei.com> Fri, 02 August 2013 07:34 UTC
Return-Path: <bill.wu@huawei.com>
X-Original-To: xrblock@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: xrblock@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B9BA721E8270 for <xrblock@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 2 Aug 2013 00:34:48 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 0.622
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.622 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-2.166, BAYES_00=-2.599, CHARSET_FARAWAY_HEADER=3.2, CN_BODY_35=0.339, MIME_8BIT_HEADER=0.3, MIME_BASE64_TEXT=1.753, MIME_CHARSET_FARAWAY=2.45, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4, SARE_SUB_ENC_GB2312=1.345]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id eShI4KtngdiP for <xrblock@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 2 Aug 2013 00:34:44 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lhrrgout.huawei.com (lhrrgout.huawei.com [194.213.3.17]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D826D21E82C7 for <xrblock@ietf.org>; Fri, 2 Aug 2013 00:33:48 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from 172.18.7.190 (EHLO lhreml203-edg.china.huawei.com) ([172.18.7.190]) by lhrrg02-dlp.huawei.com (MOS 4.3.5-GA FastPath queued) with ESMTP id AUA37634; Fri, 02 Aug 2013 07:33:47 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from LHREML406-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.201.5.243) by lhreml203-edg.huawei.com (172.18.7.221) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.1.323.7; Fri, 2 Aug 2013 08:33:31 +0100
Received: from NKGEML408-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.98.56.39) by lhreml406-hub.china.huawei.com (10.201.5.243) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.1.323.7; Fri, 2 Aug 2013 08:33:47 +0100
Received: from NKGEML501-MBS.china.huawei.com ([169.254.2.43]) by nkgeml408-hub.china.huawei.com ([10.98.56.39]) with mapi id 14.01.0323.007; Fri, 2 Aug 2013 15:33:43 +0800
From: Qin Wu <bill.wu@huawei.com>
To: Varun Singh <vsingh.ietf@gmail.com>, Shida Schubert <shida@ntt-at.com>
Thread-Topic: [xrblock] Consensus call on splitting the RLE draft to two
Thread-Index: AQHOjlIQBCCs/IaS80W8geosN57Vppl/dnQAgAIPxeA=
Date: Fri, 02 Aug 2013 07:33:42 +0000
Message-ID: <B8F9A780D330094D99AF023C5877DABA43B71443@nkgeml501-mbs.china.huawei.com>
References: <92230D5C-1781-4C3B-BC6F-F744ED07D232@ntt-at.com> <CAEbPqrzq3sx0zJvpS1oqkEDZFSmLUSu+KGFnhiCrM3BrdUrRCQ@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAEbPqrzq3sx0zJvpS1oqkEDZFSmLUSu+KGFnhiCrM3BrdUrRCQ@mail.gmail.com>
Accept-Language: zh-CN, en-US
Content-Language: zh-CN
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.47.157.70]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="gb2312"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected
Cc: xrblock <xrblock@ietf.org>
Subject: [xrblock] 答复: Consensus call on splitting the RLE draft to two
X-BeenThere: xrblock@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Metric Blocks for use with RTCP's Extended Report Framework working group discussion list <xrblock.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/xrblock>, <mailto:xrblock-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/xrblock>
List-Post: <mailto:xrblock@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:xrblock-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/xrblock>, <mailto:xrblock-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 02 Aug 2013 07:34:56 -0000
Hi, Varun: I have read the new draft. The text looks good, I believe all were cut from RLE discard draft and doesn't need another round process. Regards! -Qin -----邮件原件----- 发件人: xrblock-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:xrblock-bounces@ietf.org] 代表 Varun Singh 发送时间: 2013年8月1日 15:56 收件人: Shida Schubert 抄送: xrblock 主题: Re: [xrblock] Consensus call on splitting the RLE draft to two Hi all, The first version of the (discarded bytes) draft is now available. I will upload the updated RLE discard draft once the consensus call ends. Thanks, Varun ----- A new version of I-D, draft-singh-xrblock-rtcp-xr-bytes-discarded-metric-00.txt has been successfully submitted by Varun Singh and posted to the IETF repository. Filename: draft-singh-xrblock-rtcp-xr-bytes-discarded-metric Revision: 00 Title: RTP Control Protocol (RTCP) Extended Reports (XR) for Bytes Discarded Metric Creation date: 2013-08-01 Group: Individual Submission Number of pages: 11 URL: http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-singh-xrblock-rtcp-xr-bytes-discarded-metric-00.txt Status: http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-singh-xrblock-rtcp-xr-bytes-discarded-metric Htmlized: http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-singh-xrblock-rtcp-xr-bytes-discarded-metric-00 Abstract: The RTP Control Protocol (RTCP) is used in conjunction with the Real- time Transport Protocol (RTP) in to provide a variety of short-term and long-term reception statistics. The available reporting may include aggregate information across longer periods of time as well as individual packet reporting. This document specifies a report computing the bytes discarded from the de-jitter buffer after successful reception. Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of submission until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org. The IETF Secretariat On Thu, Aug 1, 2013 at 2:56 AM, Shida Schubert <shida@ntt-at.com> wrote: > > Following the tao of IETF, I want to make sure splitting the RLE > draft into two drafts is not only the consensus in the meeting room > but also on the mailing list. > > Varun will be submitting the discard-bytes portion of the draft > shortly. > > If you have any objection against splitting up the draft, please > provide your comments. > > Many Thanks > Shida as co-chair > _______________________________________________ > xrblock mailing list > xrblock@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/xrblock -- http://www.netlab.tkk.fi/~varun/ _______________________________________________ xrblock mailing list xrblock@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/xrblock