IETF Logo Mail Archive

[xrblock] FW: [MMUSIC] SDP Directorate: Review of draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-synchronization-02

"Romascanu, Dan (Dan)" <dromasca@avaya.com> Thu, 07 March 2013 08:38 UTC

Return-Path: <dromasca@avaya.com>
X-Original-To: xrblock@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: xrblock@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E839721F8678 for <xrblock@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 7 Mar 2013 00:38:07 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -103.474
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-103.474 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.125, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Fua6gjZrrp4j for <xrblock@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 7 Mar 2013 00:38:00 -0800 (PST)
Received: from co300216-co-outbound.net.avaya.com (co300216-co-outbound.net.avaya.com [198.152.13.100]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C6AC121F8667 for <xrblock@ietf.org>; Thu, 7 Mar 2013 00:37:57 -0800 (PST)
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AgMFAHpXMFHGmAcF/2dsb2JhbABEgma/Tn8Wc4IfAQEBAQMBAQEPKDQLDAYBCA0EBAEBCxQJLgsUBwEBBQUEDgUIARmHcQELpFaUGYgqjmMGIAsCC4JZYQOcWopRgVKBNoIn
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.84,760,1355115600"; d="scan'208";a="907272"
Received: from unknown (HELO co300216-co-erhwest.avaya.com) ([198.152.7.5]) by co300216-co-outbound.net.avaya.com with ESMTP; 07 Mar 2013 03:37:56 -0500
Received: from unknown (HELO AZ-FFEXHC01.global.avaya.com) ([135.64.58.11]) by co300216-co-erhwest-out.avaya.com with ESMTP; 07 Mar 2013 03:37:06 -0500
Received: from AZ-FFEXMB04.global.avaya.com ([fe80::6db7:b0af:8480:c126]) by AZ-FFEXHC01.global.avaya.com ([135.64.58.11]) with mapi id 14.02.0328.009; Thu, 7 Mar 2013 03:37:56 -0500
From: "Romascanu, Dan (Dan)" <dromasca@avaya.com>
To: "xrblock@ietf.org" <xrblock@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [MMUSIC] SDP Directorate: Review of draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-synchronization-02
Thread-Index: AQHOGt5yH0u0GUQmikyhyoredI+8/5iZ6Dhg
Date: Thu, 07 Mar 2013 08:37:55 +0000
Message-ID: <9904FB1B0159DA42B0B887B7FA8119CA0A2024@AZ-FFEXMB04.global.avaya.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [135.64.58.45]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Subject: [xrblock] FW: [MMUSIC] SDP Directorate: Review of draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-synchronization-02
X-BeenThere: xrblock@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Metric Blocks for use with RTCP's Extended Report Framework working group discussion list <xrblock.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/xrblock>, <mailto:xrblock-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/xrblock>
List-Post: <mailto:xrblock@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:xrblock-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/xrblock>, <mailto:xrblock-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 07 Mar 2013 08:38:08 -0000

-----Original Message-----
From: mmusic-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:mmusic-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Ali C. Begen (abegen)
Sent: Thursday, March 07, 2013 4:50 AM
To: draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-synchronization@tools.ietf.org
Cc: mmusic@ietf.org
Subject: [MMUSIC] SDP Directorate: Review of draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-synchronization-02

I am the assigned SDP directorate reviewer for this draft. For background on the SDP directorate, please see the FAQ at http://www.ietf.org/iesg/directorate/sdp.html

Please wait for direction from your document shepherd or AD before posting a new version of the draft.

Summary:
- The RTCP XR extension syntax has some issues, see below
- There are a few editorial issues

Issues:
1) Section 1.4, parag. 1 is confusing. I understand what you mean but there are some plural/singular issues that need to be fixed.

2) Section 5.1. As I understand the two blocks can be used separately or together (Correct me if I am wrong). So, the ABNF should be as follows:

   xr-format =/ xr-rfisd-block / xr-rfso-block
   xr-rfisd-block = "init-syn-delay"
   xr-rfso-block = "syn-offset"

3) I actually prefer "sync" instead of "syn" in the registrations since syn is something related to TCP and might be confusing here.

4) Section 6. Write the full name of the registry (RTP Control Protocol Extended Reports (RTCP XR) Session Description Protocol (SDP) Parameters Registry). Also, the parameters you are registering should be "init-syn-delay" and "syn-offset" according to Section 5.1.

5) Section 5.2. It is not specified whether this parameter is unilateral or not.

6) Section 6. Write the full name of the registry (RTP Control Protocol Extended Reports (RTCP XR) Block Type Registry).

7) Section 6. Put a note for the RFC editor asking to replace the <RFISD> and <RFSO> with the actual values upon publications. 

_______________________________________________
mmusic mailing list
mmusic@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mmusic

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email