IETF Logo Mail Archive

[xrblock] 答复: Burst Gap drafts Status

Qin Wu <bill.wu@huawei.com> Tue, 10 July 2012 14:56 UTC

Return-Path: <bill.wu@huawei.com>
X-Original-To: xrblock@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: xrblock@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CAFC411E8088 for <xrblock@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 10 Jul 2012 07:56:37 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.914
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.914 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-3.363, BAYES_00=-2.599, CHARSET_FARAWAY_HEADER=3.2, MIME_8BIT_HEADER=0.3, MIME_BASE64_TEXT=1.753, MIME_CHARSET_FARAWAY=2.45, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4, SARE_SUB_ENC_GB2312=1.345]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id DLcnBb9dFf4E for <xrblock@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 10 Jul 2012 07:56:37 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from dfwrgout.huawei.com (dfwrgout.huawei.com [206.16.17.72]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 262C011E807F for <xrblock@ietf.org>; Tue, 10 Jul 2012 07:56:37 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from 172.18.9.243 (EHLO dfweml201-edg.china.huawei.com) ([172.18.9.243]) by dfwrg02-dlp.huawei.com (MOS 4.2.3-GA FastPath) with ESMTP id AHQ13561; Tue, 10 Jul 2012 10:57:04 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from DFWEML403-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.193.5.151) by dfweml201-edg.china.huawei.com (172.18.9.107) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.1.323.3; Tue, 10 Jul 2012 07:55:07 -0700
Received: from SZXEML432-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.72.61.60) by dfweml403-hub.china.huawei.com (10.193.5.151) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.1.323.3; Tue, 10 Jul 2012 07:55:10 -0700
Received: from SZXEML523-MBS.china.huawei.com ([169.254.6.147]) by SZXEML432-HUB.china.huawei.com ([10.72.61.60]) with mapi id 14.01.0323.003; Tue, 10 Jul 2012 22:55:07 +0800
From: Qin Wu <bill.wu@huawei.com>
To: "Romascanu, Dan (Dan)" <dromasca@avaya.com>, "Claire Bi(jiayu)" <bijy@sttri.com.cn>, xrblock <xrblock@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [xrblock] Burst Gap drafts Status
Thread-Index: Ac1eXx/lnAP619pkF0CjrtKZvIpx0wAP49zQAANQ9p4=
Date: Tue, 10 Jul 2012 14:55:07 +0000
Message-ID: <B8F9A780D330094D99AF023C5877DABA43011B52@szxeml523-mbs.china.huawei.com>
References: <136707783.24291341896234959.JavaMail.hermes@ent-web2> <DCA5E33723DD4E46BD2B76B9C1BB5D6F@china.huawei.com>, <EDC652A26FB23C4EB6384A4584434A0407CC38AE@307622ANEX5.global.avaya.com>
In-Reply-To: <EDC652A26FB23C4EB6384A4584434A0407CC38AE@307622ANEX5.global.avaya.com>
Accept-Language: zh-CN, en-US
Content-Language: zh-CN
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [172.24.1.69]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="gb2312"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected
Subject: [xrblock] 答复: Burst Gap drafts Status
X-BeenThere: xrblock@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Metric Blocks for use with RTCP's Extended Report Framework working group discussion list <xrblock.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/xrblock>, <mailto:xrblock-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/xrblock>
List-Post: <mailto:xrblock@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:xrblock-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/xrblock>, <mailto:xrblock-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 10 Jul 2012 14:56:37 -0000

Great!

Regards!
-Qin
________________________________________
发件人: xrblock-bounces@ietf.org [xrblock-bounces@ietf.org] 代表 Romascanu, Dan (Dan) [dromasca@avaya.com]
发送时间: 2012年7月10日 21:35
到: Qin Wu; Claire Bi(jiayu); xrblock
主题: Re: [xrblock] Burst Gap drafts Status

Hi,

I plan to start the WGLC soon in order to gather feedback before the IETF meeting. Any pending comments can be queued and will be considered together with the other WGLC comments.

Regards,

Dan



From: xrblock-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:xrblock-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Qin Wu
Sent: Tuesday, July 10, 2012 8:41 AM
To: Claire Bi(jiayu); xrblock
Subject: Re: [xrblock] Burst Gap drafts Status

Hi,Claire:
If my memory is correct, these two drafts are now in the Queue of drafts for WGLC.
Regarding your quick comment, yes, these two drafts should be updated to make
consistent with other XR drafts.
Thanks!

Regards!
-Qin
----- Original Message -----
From: Claire Bi(jiayu)<mailto:bijy@sttri.com.cn>
To: xrblock<mailto:xrblock@ietf.org>
Sent: Tuesday, July 10, 2012 12:57 PM
Subject: [xrblock] Burst Gap drafts Status

Hi,all:

I'm wondering what's the status of Burst Gap drafts?
I have reviewed draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-burst-gap-discard
and draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-burst-gap-loss and have one comment that is applied to both document.

1 bit Interval metric flag in the metric block is not consistent with other XR drafts that complete WGLC.
I think this issue should be fixed before going for WGLC.
Regards!

Claire Bi
________________________________
_______________________________________________
xrblock mailing list
xrblock@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/xrblock

v2.27.6 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status