IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [xrblock] I-D Action: draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-pdv-06.txt

"Romascanu, Dan (Dan)" <dromasca@avaya.com> Mon, 17 September 2012 15:24 UTC

Return-Path: <dromasca@avaya.com>
X-Original-To: xrblock@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: xrblock@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 03B3121F852D for <xrblock@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 17 Sep 2012 08:24:49 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -103.334
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-103.334 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.265, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id LZYYhP7cwoZL for <xrblock@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 17 Sep 2012 08:24:48 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from de307622-de-outbound.net.avaya.com (de307622-de-outbound.net.avaya.com [198.152.71.100]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3F7CB21F86DF for <xrblock@ietf.org>; Mon, 17 Sep 2012 08:24:48 -0700 (PDT)
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: Av8EAII/V1DGmAcF/2dsb2JhbABEvBaBB4IgAQEBAQMSHgo/DAQCAQgNAQMEAQEBCgYMCwEGAUUJCAEBBBMIGodenW6ca4shhghgA5IxhEWEboofgmg
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.80,437,1344225600"; d="scan'208";a="325026788"
Received: from unknown (HELO co300216-co-erhwest.avaya.com) ([198.152.7.5]) by de307622-de-outbound.net.avaya.com with ESMTP; 17 Sep 2012 11:19:48 -0400
Received: from unknown (HELO 307622ANEX5.global.avaya.com) ([135.64.140.12]) by co300216-co-erhwest-out.avaya.com with ESMTP; 17 Sep 2012 11:17:21 -0400
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5
Content-class: urn:content-classes:message
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Date: Mon, 17 Sep 2012 17:24:28 +0200
Message-ID: <EDC652A26FB23C4EB6384A4584434A0408129CE1@307622ANEX5.global.avaya.com>
In-Reply-To: <97145FC2-05CD-43E5-AF51-B1BCC69B9F04@csperkins.org>
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
Thread-Topic: [xrblock] I-D Action: draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-pdv-06.txt
Thread-Index: Ac2UAc0/WkA5UoccQ42ZZB14NLRlZgA5kIJQ
References: <EDC652A26FB23C4EB6384A4584434A0408129C10@307622ANEX5.global.avaya.com> <97145FC2-05CD-43E5-AF51-B1BCC69B9F04@csperkins.org>
From: "Romascanu, Dan (Dan)" <dromasca@avaya.com>
To: Colin Perkins <csp@csperkins.org>
Cc: xrblock@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [xrblock] I-D Action: draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-pdv-06.txt
X-BeenThere: xrblock@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Metric Blocks for use with RTCP's Extended Report Framework working group discussion list <xrblock.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/xrblock>, <mailto:xrblock-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/xrblock>
List-Post: <mailto:xrblock@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:xrblock-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/xrblock>, <mailto:xrblock-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 17 Sep 2012 15:24:49 -0000

Thanks, Colin for catching this. 

Gonzalo, can you fix this in a note to the RFC Editor as follows: 

'In the Abstract": s/ This document defines a Real-Time Control Protocol
(RTCP)/ This document defines a RTP Control Protocol (RTCP)/

Thanks and Regards,

Dan



> -----Original Message-----
> From: Colin Perkins [mailto:csp@csperkins.org]
> Sent: Sunday, September 16, 2012 2:53 PM
> To: Romascanu, Dan (Dan)
> Cc: xrblock@ietf.org
> Subject: Re: [xrblock] I-D Action:
draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-pdv-06.txt
> 
> On 16 Sep 2012, at 09:55, Romascanu, Dan (Dan) wrote:
> > A revised version of raft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-pdv was issued in
order
> to address the problems raised in DISCUSSes and COMMENTs during the
IESG
> review.
> >
> > We believe that the changes are editorial and clarification in
nature,
> they do not affect bits on the wire and improve the quality of the
> document. However, more scrutiny from the other WG participants never
> harms. Please read the revised version and let us know before 9/21 if
> you see any problems.
> 
> 
> The abstract is changed to expand RTCP as "Real-Time Control
Protocol",
> but the correct expansion is "RTP Control Protocol".
> 
> --
> Colin Perkins
> http://csperkins.org/
> 
>

v2.30.2 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status