Re: [xrblock] draft-ietf-xrblock-independent-burst-gap-discard to the IESG?

"Romascanu, Dan (Dan)" <> Mon, 09 May 2016 13:02 UTC

Return-Path: <>
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id DBB8412D191 for <>; Mon, 9 May 2016 06:02:16 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -7.895
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.895 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.996] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from ([]) by localhost ( []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id MkzeBU4Hl-wF for <>; Mon, 9 May 2016 06:02:10 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ( []) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E967C12B039 for <>; Mon, 9 May 2016 06:02:08 -0700 (PDT)
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.24,600,1454994000"; d="scan'208,217";a="186269119"
Received: from unknown (HELO ([]) by with ESMTP; 09 May 2016 09:02:07 -0400
X-OutboundMail_SMTP: 1
Received: from unknown (HELO ([]) by with ESMTP/TLS/AES256-SHA; 09 May 2016 09:02:05 -0400
Received: from ([fe80::6db7:b0af:8480:c126]) by ([]) with mapi id 14.03.0174.001; Mon, 9 May 2016 09:02:03 -0400
From: "Romascanu, Dan (Dan)" <>
To: xrblock <>
Thread-Topic: [xrblock] draft-ietf-xrblock-independent-burst-gap-discard to the IESG?
Thread-Index: AdGUsapJ2F/INrs6TnWb10GEYnPa6QVQL6YQ
Date: Mon, 9 May 2016 13:02:02 +0000
Message-ID: <>
References: <>
In-Reply-To: <>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
x-originating-ip: []
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_9904FB1B0159DA42B0B887B7FA8119CA751DD40AAZFFEXMB04globa_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <>
Subject: Re: [xrblock] draft-ietf-xrblock-independent-burst-gap-discard to the IESG?
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Metric Blocks for use with RTCP's Extended Report Framework working group discussion list <>
List-Unsubscribe: <>, <>
List-Archive: <>
List-Post: <>
List-Help: <>
List-Subscribe: <>, <>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 09 May 2016 13:02:17 -0000


No further comments or concerns were expressed about this I-D. I consider as confirmed by the mail list the consensus of the WG to submit the I-D to the IESG for consideration as proposed standard. All authors confirmed that they are not aware about any IPR related to the I-D.

I will finalize the shepherd write-up and submit.

Thanks to the authors and all the contributors.



From: xrblock [] On Behalf Of Romascanu, Dan (Dan)
Sent: Tuesday, April 12, 2016 2:52 PM
To: xrblock
Subject: [xrblock] draft-ietf-xrblock-independent-burst-gap-discard to the IESG?


The I-D draft-ietf-xrblock-independent-burst-gap-discard passed WGLC, SDP and PM-DIR reviews, and the comments received were incorporated in draft-ietf-xrblock-independent-burst-gap-discard-01.

This is a call to confirm consensus that this document is ready for submission to the IESG for consideration as Proposed Standard. If there are any comments, questions or concerns, please send them to the WG mail list before 4/26.

If you are aware of any relevant IPR please submit a disclosure, or talk with the chairs or the Area Director.

Thanks and Regards,