Re: [xrblock] Proposed change to summary discard draft to address discard type issue
Qin Wu <bill.wu@huawei.com> Fri, 21 September 2012 02:03 UTC
Return-Path: <bill.wu@huawei.com>
X-Original-To: xrblock@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: xrblock@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6E28121F85F3 for <xrblock@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 20 Sep 2012 19:03:04 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -5.307
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.307 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.462, BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MIME_BASE64_TEXT=1.753, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 3v0VLQEHxrBX for <xrblock@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 20 Sep 2012 19:03:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lhrrgout.huawei.com (lhrrgout.huawei.com [194.213.3.17]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1918B21F85F0 for <xrblock@ietf.org>; Thu, 20 Sep 2012 19:03:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from 172.18.7.190 (EHLO lhreml204-edg.china.huawei.com) ([172.18.7.190]) by lhrrg02-dlp.huawei.com (MOS 4.3.5-GA FastPath queued) with ESMTP id AJW37190; Fri, 21 Sep 2012 02:03:02 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from LHREML402-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.201.5.241) by lhreml204-edg.china.huawei.com (172.18.7.223) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.1.323.3; Fri, 21 Sep 2012 03:02:08 +0100
Received: from SZXEML423-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.82.67.162) by lhreml402-hub.china.huawei.com (10.201.5.241) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.1.323.3; Fri, 21 Sep 2012 03:02:34 +0100
Received: from w53375 (10.138.41.149) by szxeml423-hub.china.huawei.com (10.82.67.162) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.1.323.3; Fri, 21 Sep 2012 10:02:24 +0800
Message-ID: <B93E95918536406C9E8022A4B49E7180@china.huawei.com>
From: Qin Wu <bill.wu@huawei.com>
To: "Huangyihong (Rachel)" <rachel.huang@huawei.com>, xrblock <xrblock@ietf.org>
References: <51E6A56BD6A85142B9D172C87FC3ABBB4438C7ED@szxeml539-mbx.china.huawei.com>
Date: Fri, 21 Sep 2012 10:02:23 +0800
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_00F8_01CD97E0.325879A0"
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.5931
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.6109
X-Originating-IP: [10.138.41.149]
X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected
Subject: Re: [xrblock] Proposed change to summary discard draft to address discard type issue
X-BeenThere: xrblock@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Metric Blocks for use with RTCP's Extended Report Framework working group discussion list <xrblock.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/xrblock>, <mailto:xrblock-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/xrblock>
List-Post: <mailto:xrblock@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:xrblock-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/xrblock>, <mailto:xrblock-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 21 Sep 2012 02:03:04 -0000
Your proposed change looks good. Regards! -Qin ----- Original Message ----- From: Huangyihong (Rachel) To: xrblock Sent: Friday, September 21, 2012 9:41 AM Subject: [xrblock] Proposed change to summary discard draft to address discard type issue Hi all, In the last IETF meeting, one open issue of summary statistics draft (http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-summary-stat-00) raised is to add some words to point out discard type chosen. Here is the proposed text to address this issue. In section 3.2.2, the description of Gap Discard Rate field, the third paragraph. OLD TEXT: " where "number of packets discarded" is obtained from the RTCP XR Discard Block [DISCARD] and Packets Expected is calculated as the difference between "extended last sequence number" and "extended first sequence number" (Interval or Cumulative) provided in the Measurement Information block [MEASIDENT]. " NEW TEXT: " where "number of packets discarded" is filled with number of packets due to both early and late to be played out which is obtained from the RTCP XR Discard Block [DISCARD], and Packets Expected is calculated as the difference between "extended last sequence number" and "extended first sequence number" (Interval or Cumulative) provided in the Measurement Information block [MEASIDENT]. " Best Regards! Rachel Best Regards! Rachel ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ _______________________________________________ xrblock mailing list xrblock@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/xrblock
- [xrblock] Proposed change to summary discard draf… Huangyihong (Rachel)
- Re: [xrblock] Proposed change to summary discard … Qin Wu
- Re: [xrblock] Proposed change to summary discard … Glen Zorn
- Re: [xrblock] Proposed change to summary discard … Huangyihong (Rachel)
- Re: [xrblock] Proposed change to summary discard … Glen Zorn
- Re: [xrblock] Proposed change to summary discard … Huangyihong (Rachel)
- Re: [xrblock] Proposed change to summary discard … Qin Wu
- Re: [xrblock] Proposed change to summary discard … Glen Zorn
- Re: [xrblock] Proposed change to summary discard … Qin Wu