Re: [xrblock] I-D Action: draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcweb-rtcp-xr-metrics-01.txt
Shida Schubert <shida@ntt-at.com> Tue, 24 March 2015 21:25 UTC
Return-Path: <shida@ntt-at.com>
X-Original-To: xrblock@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: xrblock@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B04F81A1A12 for <xrblock@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 24 Mar 2015 14:25:57 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.451
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.451 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_BRBL_LASTEXT=1.449, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 69wVQo_ABCSX for <xrblock@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 24 Mar 2015 14:25:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from gator4135.hostgator.com (gator4135.hostgator.com [192.185.4.147]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0246F1A1A0C for <xrblock@ietf.org>; Tue, 24 Mar 2015 14:25:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [31.133.182.194] (port=65171 helo=dhcp-b6c2.meeting.ietf.org) by gator4135.hostgator.com with esmtpsa (TLSv1:DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from <shida@ntt-at.com>) id 1YaWKf-0007Km-Df; Tue, 24 Mar 2015 16:25:53 -0500
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_DF2F59F1-CF2F-403C-AA55-D1EE8BCCB90D"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 8.2 \(2070.6\))
From: Shida Schubert <shida@ntt-at.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAEbPqrwxzBk4kr+XgFwdBOUDaiPyLz--22T3kx-uR8WX7JHsCw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 24 Mar 2015 16:25:52 -0500
Message-Id: <325ADF4D-67BC-4974-831C-BFD6DFCB3432@ntt-at.com>
References: <20150228172233.11376.10175.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <CAEbPqrwxzBk4kr+XgFwdBOUDaiPyLz--22T3kx-uR8WX7JHsCw@mail.gmail.com>
To: Varun Singh <vsingh.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.2070.6)
X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report
X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - gator4135.hostgator.com
X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - ietf.org
X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12]
X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - ntt-at.com
X-BWhitelist: no
X-Source-IP: 31.133.182.194
X-Exim-ID: 1YaWKf-0007Km-Df
X-Source:
X-Source-Args:
X-Source-Dir:
X-Source-Sender: (dhcp-b6c2.meeting.ietf.org) [31.133.182.194]:65171
X-Source-Auth: shida@agnada.com
X-Email-Count: 3
X-Source-Cap: c3NoaWRhO3NzaGlkYTtnYXRvcjQxMzUuaG9zdGdhdG9yLmNvbQ==
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/xrblock/YejmlemQL4vc7c4Gj0su29vf3Bc>
Cc: xrblock <xrblock@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [xrblock] I-D Action: draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcweb-rtcp-xr-metrics-01.txt
X-BeenThere: xrblock@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Metric Blocks for use with RTCP's Extended Report Framework working group discussion list <xrblock.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/xrblock>, <mailto:xrblock-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/xrblock/>
List-Post: <mailto:xrblock@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:xrblock-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/xrblock>, <mailto:xrblock-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 24 Mar 2015 21:25:57 -0000
Folks; Any feedback on Varun’s question below? Shida as co-chair > On Feb 28, 2015, at 2:47 PM, Varun Singh <vsingh.ietf@gmail.com> wrote: > > Hi all, > > The -01 draft incorporates the changes discussed at IETF 91. > - new registry defined for WebRTC Statistics API > - added the SR and RR metrics, which were earlier in draft-alvestrand-rtcweb-stats-registry > - changed the TitleCased identifiers to camelCase, to keep consistency with the W3C document. > > OPEN ISSUE (burst metrics): > The document currently defines two sets of burst metrics > - Section 6.7: Reports cumulative packets in a burst and the corresponding burst counts. > - Section 6.8.: Reports the average fraction of packets lost in a burst/gap. > > From section 6.7, we can infer the average burst of packet loss/discards by dividing the total_packets_lost_in_burst/burst_count. > >From section 6.8, we can infer the impact of the burst packet loss, i.e., total_burst_loss/totel_expected_packets/burst_count > > Do we keep both? or pick one? > > Thoughts and comments on the open issue and the document in general are appreciated. > > Regards, > Varun (on behalf of the authors) > > > > > > > On Sat, Feb 28, 2015 at 7:22 PM, <internet-drafts@ietf.org <mailto:internet-drafts@ietf.org>> wrote: > > > > A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories. > > This draft is a work item of the Metric Blocks for use with RTCP's Extended Report Framework Working Group of the IETF. > > > > Title : Considerations for Selecting RTCP Extended Report (XR) Metrics for the WebRTC Statistics API > > Authors : Varun Singh > > Rachel Huang > > Roni Even > > Dan Romascanu > > Lingli Deng > > Filename : draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcweb-rtcp-xr-metrics-01.txt > > Pages : 17 > > Date : 2015-02-28 > > > > Abstract: > > This document describes monitoring features related to media streams > > in Web real-time communication (WebRTC). It provides a list of RTCP > > Sender Report, Receiver Report and Extended Report metrics, which may > > need to be supported by RTP implementations in some diverse > > environments. It also defines a new IANA registry, a list of > > identifiers for the WebRTC's statistics API. These identifiers are a > > set of RTCP SR, RR, and XR metrics related to the transport of > > multimedia flows. > > > > > > The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is: > > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcweb-rtcp-xr-metrics/ <https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcweb-rtcp-xr-metrics/> > > > > There's also a htmlized version available at: > > http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcweb-rtcp-xr-metrics-01 <http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcweb-rtcp-xr-metrics-01> > > > > A diff from the previous version is available at: > > http://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcweb-rtcp-xr-metrics-01 <http://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcweb-rtcp-xr-metrics-01> > > > > > > Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of submission > > until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org <http://tools.ietf.org/>. > > > > Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at: > > ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/ <ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/> > > > > _______________________________________________ > > xrblock mailing list > > xrblock@ietf.org <mailto:xrblock@ietf.org> > > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/xrblock <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/xrblock> > > -- > http://www.callstats.io <http://www.callstats.io/>_______________________________________________ > xrblock mailing list > xrblock@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/xrblock
- Re: [xrblock] I-D Action: draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcw… Shida Schubert
- Re: [xrblock] I-D Action: draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcw… Roni Even
- Re: [xrblock] I-D Action: draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcw… Romascanu, Dan (Dan)
- Re: [xrblock] I-D Action: draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcw… Varun Singh
- [xrblock] 答复: I-D Action: draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcw… Huangyihong (Rachel)
- Re: [xrblock] I-D Action: draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcw… Shida Schubert
- [xrblock] I-D Action: draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcweb-r… internet-drafts
- Re: [xrblock] I-D Action: draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcw… Varun Singh
- Re: [xrblock] I-D Action: draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcw… Varun Singh
- Re: [xrblock] I-D Action: draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcw… Romascanu, Dan (Dan)
- Re: [xrblock] I-D Action: draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcw… Varun Singh
- Re: [xrblock] I-D Action: draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcw… Romascanu, Dan (Dan)
- Re: [xrblock] I-D Action: draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcw… Shida Schubert