[xrblock] meeting at IETF-91
"Romascanu, Dan (Dan)" <dromasca@avaya.com> Thu, 04 September 2014 12:51 UTC
Return-Path: <dromasca@avaya.com>
X-Original-To: xrblock@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: xrblock@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8E66A1A8893 for <xrblock@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 4 Sep 2014 05:51:47 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.132
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.132 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_05=-0.5, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, LONGWORDS=2.035, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.668] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id DzMQ5Kywynyb for <xrblock@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 4 Sep 2014 05:51:44 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from co300216-co-outbound.net.avaya.com (co300216-co-outbound.net.avaya.com [198.152.13.100]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 05B941A889D for <xrblock@ietf.org>; Thu, 4 Sep 2014 05:51:43 -0700 (PDT)
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AhELAFBfCFTGmAcV/2dsb2JhbABZgkcjI1Nbrz0GBaArAYEGFneEBQEBAxIbXgEMCRVWJgEEGxqIIAGXfoRloBAYhXyJIINngR0FkT6TEI1Ag2GCNIEHAQEB
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos; i="5.04,465,1406606400"; d="scan'208,217"; a="81068557"
Received: from unknown (HELO co300216-co-erhwest-exch.avaya.com) ([198.152.7.21]) by co300216-co-outbound.net.avaya.com with ESMTP; 04 Sep 2014 08:51:42 -0400
X-OutboundMail_SMTP: 1
Received: from unknown (HELO AZ-FFEXHC02.global.avaya.com) ([135.64.58.12]) by co300216-co-erhwest-out.avaya.com with ESMTP/TLS/AES128-SHA; 04 Sep 2014 08:51:42 -0400
Received: from AZ-FFEXMB04.global.avaya.com ([fe80::6db7:b0af:8480:c126]) by AZ-FFEXHC02.global.avaya.com ([135.64.58.12]) with mapi id 14.03.0174.001; Thu, 4 Sep 2014 14:51:41 +0200
From: "Romascanu, Dan (Dan)" <dromasca@avaya.com>
To: xrblock <xrblock@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: meeting at IETF-91
Thread-Index: Ac/IPvXVp1BV2jCTQOiCJVNTo77+kA==
Date: Thu, 04 Sep 2014 12:51:41 +0000
Message-ID: <9904FB1B0159DA42B0B887B7FA8119CA5C8868C0@AZ-FFEXMB04.global.avaya.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [135.64.58.46]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_9904FB1B0159DA42B0B887B7FA8119CA5C8868C0AZFFEXMB04globa_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/xrblock/YlfdXh4MIl6dEViaPsNUCzoBAvI
Subject: [xrblock] meeting at IETF-91
X-BeenThere: xrblock@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Metric Blocks for use with RTCP's Extended Report Framework working group discussion list <xrblock.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/xrblock>, <mailto:xrblock-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/xrblock/>
List-Post: <mailto:xrblock@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:xrblock-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/xrblock>, <mailto:xrblock-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 04 Sep 2014 12:51:47 -0000
Hi, It's time (already!) to submit a request for a meeting slot at IETF-91. Should we ask for one session of one hour - as at IETF-90? The current list of conflicts includes: trill siprec rtcweb raiarea payload opsawg opsarea netmod netconf mmusic lmap ippm insipid codec bmwg bfcpbis avtext avtcore tsvarea sacm alto spring pce mpls i2rs idr Are there other conflicts to avoid? Other special requests? Different proposals? Thanks and Regards, Dan
- [xrblock] meeting at IETF-91 Romascanu, Dan (Dan)
- Re: [xrblock] meeting at IETF-91 Varun Singh
- Re: [xrblock] meeting at IETF-91 Huangyihong (Rachel)