[xrblock] Mirja Kühlewind's Discuss on draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcweb-rtcp-xr-metrics-09: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)

Mirja Kühlewind <ietf@kuehlewind.net> Fri, 18 May 2018 11:21 UTC

Return-Path: <ietf@kuehlewind.net>
X-Original-To: xrblock@ietf.org
Delivered-To: xrblock@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 56F8F12D869; Fri, 18 May 2018 04:21:34 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
From: Mirja Kühlewind <ietf@kuehlewind.net>
To: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
Cc: draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcweb-rtcp-xr-metrics@ietf.org, Shida Schubert <shida.at.ietf@gmail.com>, xrblock-chairs@ietf.org, shida.at.ietf@gmail.com, xrblock@ietf.org
X-Test-IDTracker: no
X-IETF-IDTracker: 6.80.0
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Message-ID: <152664249428.1496.6832537943897538630.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Fri, 18 May 2018 04:21:34 -0700
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/xrblock/YpYkUonWa9FImAhjB2sS8yJE010>
Subject: [xrblock] Mirja Kühlewind's Discuss on draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcweb-rtcp-xr-metrics-09: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: xrblock@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
List-Id: Metric Blocks for use with RTCP's Extended Report Framework working group discussion list <xrblock.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/xrblock>, <mailto:xrblock-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/xrblock/>
List-Post: <mailto:xrblock@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:xrblock-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/xrblock>, <mailto:xrblock-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 18 May 2018 11:21:34 -0000

Mirja Kühlewind has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcweb-rtcp-xr-metrics-09: Discuss

When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)


Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html
for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.


The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcweb-rtcp-xr-metrics/



----------------------------------------------------------------------
DISCUSS:
----------------------------------------------------------------------

For the AD: Please note that the intended status in the datatracker is
"Proposed Standard" while the doc itself says "Informational". After reading
the doc, I would find informational correct. However, please clarify what the
intended status is supposed to be!


----------------------------------------------------------------------
COMMENT:
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Thanks for the well-written document. A few comments mostly on references:

- Maybe also provide an (informative) reference to
draft-ietf-rtcweb-overview-19 on the first occurrence of WebRTC...?

- Is ReportGroup defined in another RFC? If so, please provide reference in
ther terminology section.

- Maybe provide (informative) references for Mean Opinion Score (MoS) and Media
Delivery Index (MDI), as well as "Media Loss Rate (MLR) of MDI" maybe.

- It seems to me that at least [W3C.WD-webrtc-stats-20161214] should be a
normative reference.

- I wonder if it would make sense to refer to some of the IPPM RFCs that define
these or similar metrics?