Re: [xrblock] after the IPR Disclosure related to draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-video-lc

Alan Clark <alan.d.clark@telchemy.com> Tue, 05 January 2016 20:06 UTC

Return-Path: <alan.d.clark@telchemy.com>
X-Original-To: xrblock@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: xrblock@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 748D51B2D65 for <xrblock@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 5 Jan 2016 12:06:23 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.899
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.899 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id s4G_Rt5mv50f for <xrblock@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 5 Jan 2016 12:06:21 -0800 (PST)
Received: from omx.cbeyond.com (omx.cbeyond.com [50.20.30.29]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 18D541B2D5E for <xrblock@ietf.org>; Tue, 5 Jan 2016 12:06:20 -0800 (PST)
X-SBRS: None
X-HAT: Sender Group GREYLIST_RELAY, Policy $GREYLIST_RELAY applied.
X-Hostname: omx04bay.sys.cbeyond.net
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A2DsHAAOIYxW/8HTD0Vegm5MUm2CYoV3s2kBDYFkGAEIhSRHAQICgR84FAEBAQEBAQGBCgkFAQGEJAEBAQQBAQEqQQoRCw0EAgIBAQEJDAoIBwkDAgECARUfCQgTBgIBAQWIJgUJwiMBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEYi1WENwEBVAmEJgWOMIhYhUKJbYRHgx0MhTGKToNzIAEBQoFgaoFeIDQBAQGEHIFCAQEB
X-IPAS-Result: A2DsHAAOIYxW/8HTD0Vegm5MUm2CYoV3s2kBDYFkGAEIhSRHAQICgR84FAEBAQEBAQGBCgkFAQGEJAEBAQQBAQEqQQoRCw0EAgIBAQEJDAoIBwkDAgECARUfCQgTBgIBAQWIJgUJwiMBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEYi1WENwEBVAmEJgWOMIhYhUKJbYRHgx0MhTGKToNzIAEBQoFgaoFeIDQBAQGEHIFCAQEB
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.20,525,1444708800"; d="scan'208,217";a="170064937"
Received: from unknown (HELO Alans-MBP.telchemy.com) ([69.15.211.193]) by omx.cbeyond.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA; 05 Jan 2016 15:06:20 -0500
To: xrblock@ietf.org
References: <9904FB1B0159DA42B0B887B7FA8119CA6BEC8D0F@AZ-FFEXMB04.global.avaya.com> <9904FB1B0159DA42B0B887B7FA8119CA6BEDD449@AZ-FFEXMB04.global.avaya.com>
From: Alan Clark <alan.d.clark@telchemy.com>
Message-ID: <568C223A.6050009@telchemy.com>
Date: Tue, 5 Jan 2016 15:06:18 -0500
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.11; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.5.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <9904FB1B0159DA42B0B887B7FA8119CA6BEDD449@AZ-FFEXMB04.global.avaya.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------080205050404010308050708"
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/xrblock/_zH1KontBoDhhqUkTxJ5pQM4HRs>
Subject: Re: [xrblock] after the IPR Disclosure related to draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-video-lc
X-BeenThere: xrblock@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Metric Blocks for use with RTCP's Extended Report Framework working group discussion list <xrblock.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/xrblock>, <mailto:xrblock-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/xrblock/>
List-Post: <mailto:xrblock@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:xrblock-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/xrblock>, <mailto:xrblock-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 05 Jan 2016 20:06:23 -0000

I reviewed the patent that the disclosure related to - this appears to 
describe a method for video coding that uses loss concealment and not a 
method of reporting the effectiveness of loss concealment. It is of 
course the responsibility of the IPR holder to verify that their patent 
does in fact apply to the Draft/RFC to which their disclosure statement 
applies.  I suggest that the WG chairs ask the participants from the 
disclosing company to check to see if this disclosure is in fact 
relevant to the draft.

Regards

Alan


On 1/5/16 7:34 AM, Romascanu, Dan (Dan) wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> There were no responses to this query. Please express your opinions on 
> the mail list whether we should continue as planned with the approval 
> for this I-D.
>
> Possible options (other may apply):
>
> 1.Continue as planned
>
> 2.Do not continue
>
> 3.Continue, but first do …
>
> Thanks and Regards,
>
> Dan
>
> *From:*xrblock [mailto:xrblock-bounces@ietf.org] *On Behalf Of 
> *Romascanu, Dan (Dan)
> *Sent:* Wednesday, December 16, 2015 12:55 PM
> *To:* xrblock@ietf.org
> *Subject:* [xrblock] after the IPR Disclosure related to 
> draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-video-lc
>
> Hi,
>
> As you may have seen anIPR disclosure that pertains to draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-video-lc 
> was submitted recently. The announcement on the XRBLOCK mail list with 
>  more information can be read at 
> http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/xrblock/current/msg01914.html 
> <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__www.ietf.org_mail-2Darchive_web_xrblock_current_msg01914.html&d=BQMFAg&c=BFpWQw8bsuKpl1SgiZH64Q&r=I4dzGxR31OcNXCJfQzvlsiLQfucBXRucPvdrphpBsFA&m=JT0PNFMVTwcCOwfJFWR9rPXwWO3aXrz-8hcAnDMibu4&s=Y212mtSrLAN6yGGEigFnx-qwjZv_a0r5MpWucZswumg&e=>. 
>
> This I-D was on the agenda of the IESG telechat this Thursday 12/17. 
> Our AD decided to defer this I-D to the next telechat scheduled for 
> January 7, 2016 and asked us to confirm on the mail list that the WG 
> still plans to proceed with the I-D.
> Taking into account this new information – do the participants in the 
> WG want to proceed with the approval of this Internet-Draft? Please 
> state your opinions on the WG mail list until Monday January 4, 2016.
> Thanks and Regards,
> Dan
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> xrblock mailing list
> xrblock@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/xrblock