Re: [xrblock] after the IPR Disclosure related to draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-video-lc

I reviewed the patent that the disclosure related to - this appears to 
describe a method for video coding that uses loss concealment and not a 
method of reporting the effectiveness of loss concealment. It is of 
course the responsibility of the IPR holder to verify that their patent 
does in fact apply to the Draft/RFC to which their disclosure statement 
applies.  I suggest that the WG chairs ask the participants from the 
disclosing company to check to see if this disclosure is in fact 
relevant to the draft.

Regards

Alan

On 1/5/16 7:34 AM, Romascanu, Dan (Dan) wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> There were no responses to this query. Please express your opinions on 
> the mail list whether we should continue as planned with the approval 
> for this I-D.
>
> Possible options (other may apply):
>
> 1.Continue as planned
>
> 2.Do not continue
>
> 3.Continue, but first do …
>
> Thanks and Regards,
>
> Dan
>
> *From:*xrblock [mailto:xrblock-bounces@ietf.org] *On Behalf Of 
> *Romascanu, Dan (Dan)
> *Sent:* Wednesday, December 16, 2015 12:55 PM
> *To:* xrblock@ietf.org
> *Subject:* [xrblock] after the IPR Disclosure related to 
> draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-video-lc
>
> Hi,
>
> As you may have seen anIPR disclosure that pertains to draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-video-lc 
> was submitted recently. The announcement on the XRBLOCK mail list with 
>  more information can be read at 
> http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/xrblock/current/msg01914.html 
> <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__www.ietf.org_mail-2Darchive_web_xrblock_current_msg01914.html&d=BQMFAg&c=BFpWQw8bsuKpl1SgiZH64Q&r=I4dzGxR31OcNXCJfQzvlsiLQfucBXRucPvdrphpBsFA&m=JT0PNFMVTwcCOwfJFWR9rPXwWO3aXrz-8hcAnDMibu4&s=Y212mtSrLAN6yGGEigFnx-qwjZv_a0r5MpWucZswumg&e=>. 
>
> This I-D was on the agenda of the IESG telechat this Thursday 12/17. 
> Our AD decided to defer this I-D to the next telechat scheduled for 
> January 7, 2016 and asked us to confirm on the mail list that the WG 
> still plans to proceed with the I-D.
> Taking into account this new information – do the participants in the 
> WG want to proceed with the approval of this Internet-Draft? Please 
> state your opinions on the WG mail list until Monday January 4, 2016.
> Thanks and Regards,
> Dan
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> xrblock mailing list
> xrblock@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/xrblock