[xrblock] Rearranging the fields in the loss concealment report.

Varun Singh <vsingh.ietf@gmail.com> Fri, 06 November 2015 01:21 UTC

Return-Path: <vsingh.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: xrblock@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: xrblock@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 207841ADBF8 for <xrblock@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 5 Nov 2015 17:21:52 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ErobAnoCUZv7 for <xrblock@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 5 Nov 2015 17:21:51 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-io0-x22b.google.com (mail-io0-x22b.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c06::22b]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DBB801AD324 for <xrblock@ietf.org>; Thu, 5 Nov 2015 17:21:50 -0800 (PST)
Received: by iody8 with SMTP id y8so109364592iod.1 for <xrblock@ietf.org>; Thu, 05 Nov 2015 17:21:50 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type; bh=QpMX4UjGqmqBekluh3Hvl8eq/ydwR13Qp08/xA01IdY=; b=WAvoY4vK2EvQZ2YhEA25JiCsKC7bzXX1AYyHPOhJE6q1qjY2C1Eu0TWIqV+Wf/hJDw JcI/CZpqepGhQ9DVFc/88EdKJLsxIkYDrO95ceoQQuEirFCoqUnrRlgjA5H36rPybNHC Jy54ZCK/wG0vFHhK/4eH31giE8FYa5bCFwSR0+kr8y1xqJpnDnlhvaVplS6VC55eGjPn p80dwPnQJAI+ANWgcUS7RvQxPwdHQVGx/wxUPoBr1oj8NwAv9V71DiQYWOPAfomrz141 sn17mQfRhzDDQAr3eaCi4plVxjM+Lw60z//YWD5+bfYCD/AbXAb7soL+6HOKsgTGN0sf 4b9g==
X-Received: by 10.107.30.8 with SMTP id e8mr12526680ioe.166.1446772910267; Thu, 05 Nov 2015 17:21:50 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.79.94.194 with HTTP; Thu, 5 Nov 2015 17:21:30 -0800 (PST)
From: Varun Singh <vsingh.ietf@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 6 Nov 2015 10:21:30 +0900
Message-ID: <CAEbPqrxhKKf1FZ0oQ2ikW_cULG55ChTdjAQVcwL4FR8-s_Ke+A@mail.gmail.com>
To: "Huangyihong (Rachel)" <rachel.huang@huawei.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/xrblock/g6Lcz5J6aSTWzI-ostxUWAZudXA>
Cc: "xrblock@ietf.org" <xrblock@ietf.org>
Subject: [xrblock] Rearranging the fields in the loss concealment report.
X-BeenThere: xrblock@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Metric Blocks for use with RTCP's Extended Report Framework working group discussion list <xrblock.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/xrblock>, <mailto:xrblock-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/xrblock/>
List-Post: <mailto:xrblock@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:xrblock-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/xrblock>, <mailto:xrblock-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 06 Nov 2015 01:21:52 -0000

Hi Rachel,

On Thu, Nov 5, 2015 at 10:47 AM, Varun Singh <vsingh.ietf@gmail.com> wrote:
> For making the parser easier, could the optional part of the packet be
> at the end?

I should have explained this in more detail in my email. my proposal
was to change the report block from:


    0               1               2               3
    0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
   +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
   |    BT=VLC     | I | V |  RSV  |       block length            |
   +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
   |                         SSRC of Source                        |
   +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
   |                       Impaired Duration                       |
   +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
   |                      Concealed Duration                       |
   +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
   |                  Mean Frame Freeze Duration (optional)        |
   +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
   |    MIFP       |    MCFP       |     FFSC      |     Reserved  |
   +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+

to the following:
In this case the optional 32-bits are set at the bottom of the packet.

    0               1               2               3
    0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
   +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
   |    BT=VLC     | I | V |  RSV  |       block length            |
   +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
   |                         SSRC of Source                        |
   +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
   |                       Impaired Duration                       |
   +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
   |                      Concealed Duration                       |
   +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
   |    MIFP       |    MCFP       |     FFSC      |     Reserved  |
   +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
   |                  Mean Frame Freeze Duration (optional)        |
   +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+

Regards,
Varun