[xrblock] Burst Gap drafts Status
"Claire Bi(jiayu)" <bijy@sttri.com.cn> Tue, 10 July 2012 04:56 UTC
Return-Path: <bijy@sttri.com.cn>
X-Original-To: xrblock@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: xrblock@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A48BF11E8116 for <xrblock@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 9 Jul 2012 21:56:56 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 2.384
X-Spam-Level: **
X-Spam-Status: No, score=2.384 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_20=-0.74, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MIME_HTML_ONLY=1.457, SARE_RECV_IP_218078=1.666]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id zuykdPq46ECF for <xrblock@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 9 Jul 2012 21:56:55 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from corp.21cn.com (corp.forptr.21cn.com [121.14.129.39]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B308811E810C for <xrblock@ietf.org>; Mon, 9 Jul 2012 21:56:52 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ip?218.80.215.132? (entas5.inner-hermes.com [10.27.101.5]) by corp.21cn.com (HERMES) with ESMTP id 5592C194012 for <xrblock@ietf.org>; Tue, 10 Jul 2012 12:57:14 +0800 (CST)
HMM_ATTACHE_NUM: 0000
HMM_SOURCE_IP: wmail.10.27.101.5.1212639065
HMM_SOURCE_TYPE: WEBMAIL
Received: from ip<218.80.215.132> ([218.80.215.132]) by 21CN-entas5(MEDUSA 10.27.101.5) with ESMTP id 1341896234.9360 for xrblock@ietf.org ; Tue Jul 10 12:57:17 2012
0/X-Total-Score: 3:
X-FILTER-SCORE: to=<9993838d90848c618a8695874f909388>, score=<1341896237I99P99d9EwQIPdt3n99Q99svv/vvFvY0fs/FkKuvvfvv>
Date: Tue, 10 Jul 2012 12:57:14 +0800
From: "Claire Bi(jiayu)" <bijy@sttri.com.cn>
To: xrblock <xrblock@ietf.org>
Message-ID: <136707783.24291341896234959.JavaMail.hermes@ent-web2>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----=_Part_2535_2072230457.1341896234769"
HMM_WEBCLN_IP: 10.27.10.87
X-HERMES-SENDMODE: normal
X-HERMES-SET: KoH0oguRsun5ALVzckz3EqaqqOumqw==
Subject: [xrblock] Burst Gap drafts Status
X-BeenThere: xrblock@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Metric Blocks for use with RTCP's Extended Report Framework working group discussion list <xrblock.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/xrblock>, <mailto:xrblock-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/xrblock>
List-Post: <mailto:xrblock@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:xrblock-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/xrblock>, <mailto:xrblock-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 10 Jul 2012 04:56:57 -0000
I'm wondering what's the status of Burst Gap drafts?
I have reviewed draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-burst-gap-discard
and draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-burst-gap-loss and have one comment that is applied to both document.
1 bit Interval metric flag in the metric block is not consistent with other XR drafts that complete WGLC.
I think this issue should be fixed before going for WGLC.
Claire Bi
- [xrblock] Burst Gap drafts Status Claire Bi(jiayu)
- Re: [xrblock] Burst Gap drafts Status Qin Wu
- Re: [xrblock] Burst Gap drafts Status Romascanu, Dan (Dan)
- [xrblock] 答复: Burst Gap drafts Status Qin Wu
- Re: [xrblock] Burst Gap drafts Status Qin Wu