Re: [xrblock] downref in draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-decodability-06.txt

Glen Zorn <> Mon, 04 February 2013 10:32 UTC

Return-Path: <>
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7108B21F84D8 for <>; Mon, 4 Feb 2013 02:32:57 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.776
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.776 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-1.824, BAYES_00=-2.599, FH_HOST_EQ_D_D_D_D=0.765, RCVD_IN_PBL=0.905, RCVD_IN_SORBS_DUL=0.877, RDNS_DYNAMIC=0.1]
Received: from ([]) by localhost ( []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id afQojQHdNUQB for <>; Mon, 4 Feb 2013 02:32:57 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ( [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c02::233]) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id D4E7F21F855C for <>; Mon, 4 Feb 2013 02:32:56 -0800 (PST)
Received: by with SMTP id x24so7821612iak.38 for <>; Mon, 04 Feb 2013 02:32:56 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;; s=20120113; h=x-received:message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc :subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=h1gUmREWhKwNCBTdHoD/17DB1W07DRObEGoEyAXzOVo=; b=bLgoMG0Eb0odLRjcEiZIswQZReCGCzLsATKuAg5v0HVRvhSjZZqFCi30OJUO/rTApQ AKQCyFsrxVlMM84cqoq98HZJh8TRqPv4Q2HBJqaghuT7erM2XWSosrm0htKkrb5iN9oP iuokNAkwsbM3TNTzCtcoemDvp62k8HmpVEP7izZ+3LJkNosFAGX33vdzry37eeWeUroD c6OUvFU3zCNPN0QlDUTklt15ZSzSOWr7gB4oSDsbKG1QwtUwWBu/ArxNWFVKbeWg5SOf cdWMtH3KoZKQgxYXcgex/vDvt2dmM5LiAAIgwmMyPNkrqfxK6TAeu4gKWus6vwdryMwJ WSpw==
X-Received: by with SMTP id ko8mr5259272igc.52.1359973976382; Mon, 04 Feb 2013 02:32:56 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [] ( []) by with ESMTPS id j11sm15783608igc.5.2013. (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Mon, 04 Feb 2013 02:32:55 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <>
Date: Mon, 04 Feb 2013 17:32:51 +0700
From: Glen Zorn <>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130126 Thunderbird/17.0.2
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: "Romascanu, Dan (Dan)" <>
References: <> <> <> <> <>
In-Reply-To: <>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: "" <>
Subject: Re: [xrblock] downref in draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-decodability-06.txt
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Metric Blocks for use with RTCP's Extended Report Framework working group discussion list <>
List-Unsubscribe: <>, <>
List-Archive: <>
List-Post: <>
List-Help: <>
List-Subscribe: <>, <>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 04 Feb 2013 10:32:57 -0000

On 02/04/2013 04:45 PM, Romascanu, Dan (Dan) wrote:
> Hi Rachel,
> Yes, my comment was addressed.
> We are waiting for the confirmation from Glen Zorn (as an author of the document) that all appropriate IPR disclosures required for full conformance with the provisions of BCP 78 and BCP 79 have been filled in order to progress this document (submit to the IESG).

BCP 79 says:

3.2.  Rights and Permissions

3.2.1.  All Contributions

_By submission of a Contribution_, each person actually submitting the
    Contribution, and each named co-Contributor,is _deemed to agree___ to
    the following terms and conditions, on his or her own behalf, and on
    behalf of the organizations the Contributor represents or is
    sponsored by (if any) when submitting the Contribution.

    A. The Contributor represents that he or she has made or will
       promptly make all disclosures required by Section 6.1.1 of this

    B. The Contributor represents that there are no limits to the
       Contributor's ability to make the grants, acknowledgments and
       agreements herein that are reasonably and personally known to the

    C. If the Contribution is an Internet-Draft, this agreement must be
       acknowledged, by including in the "Status of this Memo" section on
       the first page of the Contribution, the appropriate notices
       described in Section 5 of [RFC3978].

So for the 9th time (and counting!), yes, all appropriate IPR 
disclosures required for full conformance with the provisions of BCP 78 
and BCP 79 have been filed.