Re: [xrblock] Fw: I-D Action: draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-discard-05.txt

Glen Zorn <glenzorn@gmail.com> Thu, 26 July 2012 06:11 UTC

Return-Path: <glenzorn@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: xrblock@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: xrblock@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4C15021F8701 for <xrblock@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 25 Jul 2012 23:11:46 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.598
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.598 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id VCPSkdGgo3PP for <xrblock@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 25 Jul 2012 23:11:45 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-yw0-f44.google.com (mail-yw0-f44.google.com [209.85.213.44]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 27E7021F8700 for <xrblock@ietf.org>; Wed, 25 Jul 2012 23:11:45 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by yhq56 with SMTP id 56so1725013yhq.31 for <xrblock@ietf.org>; Wed, 25 Jul 2012 23:11:44 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=subject:from:to:cc:in-reply-to:references:content-type:organization :date:message-id:mime-version:x-mailer; bh=iNz28XUZg05ixHz7m48zubeOl35h9/tgrItfmKQ9tWQ=; b=dSrTQcyLGHbnOB1EfkpUO65L9p6VW+0FtMf4Nmm3HRRxkJGbh8RmLan+4SG3ercdbZ wovkQrt0nDV7oe0GWqpphC5kiKYuT3HzUu45c1wssErhflsAz8Vez/mP5w7TOSToKH7o dnrXEfYAO/hQV2eH8ZGSmvzRhhrgRyGKl5ObFlvP3aSw5rbz5sygveCeaNGUTaHTFPgK IOB+U+mxFeWF44U109K83V+4O3x+6FpwKBN5xxLURbbwUxKqP5pG1eR+x+riapS9oCJu Qj3XWysPNMkOO7u/UE8unGXbZkwtT3baqmkOA2Bmqs4/kW9SyvsHvRyuyXl0+TDmZEwS 48wg==
Received: by 10.50.17.226 with SMTP id r2mr740553igd.47.1343283104545; Wed, 25 Jul 2012 23:11:44 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.0.102] (ppp-110-169-210-180.revip5.asianet.co.th. [110.169.210.180]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id y5sm5943515igb.11.2012.07.25.23.11.42 (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Wed, 25 Jul 2012 23:11:43 -0700 (PDT)
From: Glen Zorn <glenzorn@gmail.com>
To: xrblock@ietf.org
In-Reply-To: <88D9BF6DCE6840D3B896E0C0445265B9@china.huawei.com>
References: <D8C720B9E77243D0BE6C58CA45A2A735@china.huawei.com> <88D9BF6DCE6840D3B896E0C0445265B9@china.huawei.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="=-U/zcBPkyZZyztE9j3kzU"
Organization: Network Zen
Date: Thu, 26 Jul 2012 13:11:40 +0700
Message-ID: <1343283100.7688.259.camel@gwz-laptop>
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Evolution 2.32.3 (2.32.3-1.fc14)
Subject: Re: [xrblock] Fw: I-D Action: draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-discard-05.txt
X-BeenThere: xrblock@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Metric Blocks for use with RTCP's Extended Report Framework working group discussion list <xrblock.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/xrblock>, <mailto:xrblock-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/xrblock>
List-Post: <mailto:xrblock@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:xrblock-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/xrblock>, <mailto:xrblock-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 26 Jul 2012 06:11:46 -0000

On Wed, 2012-07-25 at 14:49 +0800, Qin Wu wrote:

> Based on Alan's proposal to the open issue mentioed below, we like to add one new section after SDP signaling section as follows:
> "
> 6. Consideration for duplicate packets discards
> 
> Early/ late discards are usually regarded as a symptom of PDV due to congestion (or route changes) however duplicate packets discards have quite different causes.
> 

Why is PDV mentioned here?  

...