Re: [xrblock] WGLC - draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-jb-02.txt

Qin Wu <bill.wu@huawei.com> Fri, 14 December 2012 02:32 UTC

Return-Path: <bill.wu@huawei.com>
X-Original-To: xrblock@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: xrblock@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6C54F21F8C12 for <xrblock@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 13 Dec 2012 18:32:22 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.706
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.706 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.140, BAYES_00=-2.599, MIME_BASE64_TEXT=1.753, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id EMlUEjJqJLuH for <xrblock@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 13 Dec 2012 18:32:21 -0800 (PST)
Received: from lhrrgout.huawei.com (lhrrgout.huawei.com [194.213.3.17]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 25C6921F8C1E for <xrblock@ietf.org>; Thu, 13 Dec 2012 18:32:19 -0800 (PST)
Received: from 172.18.7.190 (EHLO lhreml203-edg.china.huawei.com) ([172.18.7.190]) by lhrrg01-dlp.huawei.com (MOS 4.3.5-GA FastPath queued) with ESMTP id ANU99990; Fri, 14 Dec 2012 02:32:19 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from LHREML401-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.201.5.240) by lhreml203-edg.huawei.com (172.18.7.221) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.1.323.3; Fri, 14 Dec 2012 02:31:23 +0000
Received: from SZXEML452-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.82.67.195) by lhreml401-hub.china.huawei.com (10.201.5.240) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.1.323.3; Fri, 14 Dec 2012 02:32:18 +0000
Received: from w53375 (10.138.41.149) by szxeml452-hub.china.huawei.com (10.82.67.195) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.1.323.3; Fri, 14 Dec 2012 10:32:15 +0800
Message-ID: <699970E5B9B04AC895CFE6BAD87813A8@china.huawei.com>
From: Qin Wu <bill.wu@huawei.com>
To: "Romascanu, Dan (Dan)" <dromasca@avaya.com>, xrblock@ietf.org
References: <9904FB1B0159DA42B0B887B7FA8119CA024844@AZ-FFEXMB04.global.avaya.com> <9904FB1B0159DA42B0B887B7FA8119CA03F828@AZ-FFEXMB04.global.avaya.com>
Date: Fri, 14 Dec 2012 10:32:13 +0800
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.5931
X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.6109
X-Originating-IP: [10.138.41.149]
X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected
Subject: Re: [xrblock] WGLC - draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-jb-02.txt
X-BeenThere: xrblock@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Metric Blocks for use with RTCP's Extended Report Framework working group discussion list <xrblock.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/xrblock>, <mailto:xrblock-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/xrblock>
List-Post: <mailto:xrblock@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:xrblock-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/xrblock>, <mailto:xrblock-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 14 Dec 2012 02:32:22 -0000

Hi,
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Romascanu, Dan (Dan)" <dromasca@avaya.com>
To: <xrblock@ietf.org>
Sent: Thursday, December 13, 2012 9:24 PM
Subject: Re: [xrblock] WGLC - draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-jb-02.txt


> This document is in good shape, I have a couple of issues that need clarification: 
> 
> 1. for all delay and water mark fields I see the following: 
> 
>>     If the measured value exceeds 0xFFFD, the value 0xFFFE SHOULD be
>      reported to indicate an over-range measurement.  If the
>      measurement is unavailable, the value 0xFFFF SHOULD be reported.
> 
> What are these SHOULD and not MUST? If there are exception cases please explain, if not s/SHOULD/MUST

[Qin]: It was brought up by Colin as well. Your point is taken. We will use "MUST".
> 
> 2. in the jitter buffer maximum delay description the following sentence seems crippled: 
> 
>> In adaptive jitter buffer implementations,
>      this value may dynamically.  
> 
> Something is missing here, please fix. 

[Qin]: Good catch, accepted. we will add "change" in beween which will be read as:
"this value may change dynamically"

> Thanks and Regards,
> 
> Dan
> 
> 
> 
> 
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: xrblock-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:xrblock-bounces@ietf.org] On
>> Behalf Of Romascanu, Dan (Dan)
>> Sent: Thursday, November 29, 2012 2:52 PM
>> To: xrblock@ietf.org
>> Subject: [xrblock] WGLC - draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-jb-02.txt
>> 
>> 
>> This is a Working Group Last Call for http://www.ietf.org/id/draft-ietf-
>> xrblock-rtcp-xr-jb-02.txt.
>> 
>> Please read and review this document, and send your comments, questions
>> and concerns to the WG list before December 13, 2012. If you have no
>> comments and you believe that the document is ready for submission to
>> the IESG as a Standards Track document please send a short message as
>> well to help us in determining the level of review and consensus.
>> 
>> Thanks and Regards,
>> 
>> Dan
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> xrblock mailing list
>> xrblock@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/xrblock
> _______________________________________________
> xrblock mailing list
> xrblock@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/xrblock