[xrblock] Proposed change to summary discard draft to address discard type issue

"Huangyihong (Rachel)" <rachel.huang@huawei.com> Fri, 21 September 2012 01:41 UTC

Return-Path: <rachel.huang@huawei.com>
X-Original-To: xrblock@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: xrblock@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1A19A21E805F for <xrblock@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 20 Sep 2012 18:41:22 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.598
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.598 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id GPHzfwydWtpu for <xrblock@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 20 Sep 2012 18:41:21 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lhrrgout.huawei.com (lhrrgout.huawei.com [194.213.3.17]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 776CD21E8047 for <xrblock@ietf.org>; Thu, 20 Sep 2012 18:41:20 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from 172.18.7.190 (EHLO lhreml203-edg.china.huawei.com) ([172.18.7.190]) by lhrrg02-dlp.huawei.com (MOS 4.3.5-GA FastPath queued) with ESMTP id AJW36038; Fri, 21 Sep 2012 01:41:18 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from LHREML403-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.201.5.217) by lhreml203-edg.huawei.com (172.18.7.221) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.1.323.3; Fri, 21 Sep 2012 02:40:43 +0100
Received: from SZXEML437-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.72.61.72) by lhreml403-hub.china.huawei.com (10.201.5.217) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.1.323.3; Fri, 21 Sep 2012 02:41:17 +0100
Received: from SZXEML539-MBX.china.huawei.com ([169.254.6.74]) by szxeml437-hub.china.huawei.com ([10.72.61.72]) with mapi id 14.01.0323.003; Fri, 21 Sep 2012 09:41:11 +0800
From: "Huangyihong (Rachel)" <rachel.huang@huawei.com>
To: xrblock <xrblock@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [xrblock] Proposed change to summary discard draft to address discard type issue
Thread-Index: Ac2XmjIsznaH566yQ9S8lYhg3OnByA==
Date: Fri, 21 Sep 2012 01:41:09 +0000
Message-ID: <51E6A56BD6A85142B9D172C87FC3ABBB4438C7ED@szxeml539-mbx.china.huawei.com>
Accept-Language: zh-CN, en-US
Content-Language: zh-CN
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.138.41.163]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_51E6A56BD6A85142B9D172C87FC3ABBB4438C7EDszxeml539mbxchi_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected
Subject: [xrblock] Proposed change to summary discard draft to address discard type issue
X-BeenThere: xrblock@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Metric Blocks for use with RTCP's Extended Report Framework working group discussion list <xrblock.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/xrblock>, <mailto:xrblock-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/xrblock>
List-Post: <mailto:xrblock@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:xrblock-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/xrblock>, <mailto:xrblock-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 21 Sep 2012 01:41:22 -0000

Hi all,

In the last IETF meeting, one open issue of summary statistics draft (http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-summary-stat-00) raised is to add some words to point out discard type chosen. Here  is the proposed text to address this issue.

In section 3.2.2, the description of Gap Discard Rate field, the third paragraph.
OLD TEXT:
"
      where "number of packets discarded" is obtained from the RTCP XR
      Discard Block [DISCARD] and Packets Expected is calculated as the
      difference between "extended last sequence number" and "extended
      first sequence number" (Interval or Cumulative) provided in the
      Measurement Information block [MEASIDENT].
"
NEW TEXT:
"
where "number of packets discarded" is filled with number of packets due to both
early and late to be played out which is obtained from the RTCP XR
Discard Block [DISCARD], and Packets Expected is calculated
as the difference between "extended last sequence number" and "extended
first sequence number" (Interval or Cumulative) provided in the
Measurement Information block [MEASIDENT].
"

Best Regards!
Rachel


Best Regards!
Rachel