Re: [xrblock] publish FPWD of Identifiers for WebRTC's Statistics API; respond by 10 Oct 2014.

Thank you Colin for the feedback. I would like to hear other
participants' opinions as well.

Another thing to note: most metrics proposed in the current draft
report cummulative values, meanwhile the XR metrics can also report
over shorter interval. The IPPM registry combines the same metric with
different measurement intervals under one numerical identifier, while
the xrblock may choose to distinguish between cumulative values and
interval values. For example: totalPacketsLost, intervalPacketsLost.

Cheers,
Varun

On Thu, Oct 9, 2014 at 4:00 PM, Colin Perkins <csp@csperkins.org> wrote:
> Hi Varun,
>
> My impression is that the IPPM metrics registry is broader than what this group would need for WebRTC. I expect draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcweb-rtcp-xr-metrics will need to include a registry of metrics that are exposed via the WebRTC statistics API. That registry might refer to the metrics via the IPPM metrics registry, but I think it’s separate to (and a subset of) the IPPM metrics registry.
>
> Colin
>
>
> On 1 Oct 2014, at 16:22, Varun Singh <vsingh.ietf@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Thank you Dan for forwarding this. Feedback on the spec, metrics is appreciated.
>>
>> In reference to WG's other work on RTCPXR-statistics, I would like to
>> hear feedback on setting up a registry, i.e., should we setup a new
>> one, reuse an IPPM registry. IIRC this was discussed briefly at the
>> last meeting (Al Morton sent a pointer earlier, details here:
>> http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/xrblock/current/threads.html#01660)
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Varun
>>
>>
>> On Wed, Oct 1, 2014 at 8:57 AM, Romascanu, Dan (Dan) <dromasca@avaya.com> wrote:
>>> Please see below the W3C Call for Consensus for the first public draft of the WebRTC stats API. This work is related to the RTCWeb work in XRBLOCK.
>>>
>>> If you wish to discuss aspects related to the XRBLOCK work you are invited to do it here. If you want to send comments or participate in the W3C CfC please send these directly to the W3C mail list.
>>>
>>> Thanks and Regards,
>>>
>>> Dan
>>>
>>>
>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>> From: Stefan Håkansson LK [mailto:stefan.lk.hakansson@ericsson.com]
>>>> Sent: Wednesday, October 01, 2014 11:50 AM
>>>> To: public-webrtc@w3.org
>>>> Subject: CfC: publish FPWD of Identifiers for WebRTC's Statistics API; respond
>>>> by 10 Oct 2014.
>>>>
>>>> Hi all,
>>>>
>>>> This is a Call for Consensus (CfC)  to publish a FPWD of 'Identifiers for
>>>> WebRTC's Statistics API'.
>>>>
>>>> The draft is here: http://w3c.github.io/webrtc-stats/
>>>>
>>>> Please review and note any concerns by responding to this mail. This CfC
>>>> ends next week, Friday, 10 Oct 2014. If you need more time, please indicate
>>>> so.
>>>>
>>>> Please note that a FPWD is just that, a first public draft, so it need not be
>>>> perfect and subsequent change is possible; publishing this draft should give it
>>>> further review and attention.
>>>>
>>>> Please respond to this CfC (even a +1 is useful). Silence will be considered
>>>> agreement.
>>>>
>>>> Thanks
>>>> Stefan
>>>>
>>>> [1] http://w3c.github.io/webrtc-stats/
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> xrblock mailing list
>>> xrblock@ietf.org
>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/xrblock
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> http://www.netlab.tkk.fi/~varun/
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> xrblock mailing list
>> xrblock@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/xrblock
>
>
>
> --
> Colin Perkins
> https://csperkins.org/
>
>
>
>

-- 
http://www.netlab.tkk.fi/~varun/