Re: [xrblock] TS Decodability Metric Reporting as WG item?

Hi,

I too support this work and can provide reviews.

On Mon, Jun 25, 2012 at 12:46 PM, Brandenburg, R. (Ray) van
<ray.vanbrandenburg@tno.nl> wrote:
> I support this work. Up until now I wasn't aware of this document, but now that I am, I am able to provide reviews.
>
> Ray
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: xrblock-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:xrblock-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Colin Perkins
> Sent: woensdag 13 juni 2012 16:55
> To: Romascanu, Dan (Dan)
> Cc: xrblock
> Subject: Re: [xrblock] TS Decodability Metric Reporting as WG item?
>
> Dan,
>
> On 11 Jun 2012, at 13:33, Romascanu, Dan (Dan) wrote:
>> Shida and me are reviewing items that may meet the consensus threshold
>> to be included in the next round of chartered deliverables for the
>> XRBLOCK WG  (pending on AD and IESG approval).
>>
>> We would like to solicit expressions of interest for including the
>> RTCP XR Report Block for Transport Stream (TS) Decodability Metric
>> reporting on the list of variable. We have an Internet-Draft
>> http://www.ietf.org/id/draft-huang-xrblock-rtcp-xr-decodability-03.txt
>> with four co-authors. Who else is interested in working on this item?
>> Implementing? Reviewing?
>
>
> I've read this draft, and will review future versions. I'm not an MPEG expert, and so can't comment on the MPEG aspects, but it appears to use RTCP XR in a reasonable way. I'd support it being adopted as a working group draft, provided there's nothing wrong with the metrics from the MPEG viewpoint.
>
> --
> Colin Perkins
> http://csperkins.org/
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> xrblock mailing list
> xrblock@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/xrblock
> This e-mail and its contents are subject to the DISCLAIMER at http://www.tno.nl/emaildisclaimer
>
> _______________________________________________
> xrblock mailing list
> xrblock@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/xrblock

-- 
http://www.netlab.tkk.fi/~varun/