Re: [xrblock] SDP Directorate review of draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-discard

Glen Zorn <gwz@net-zen.net> Tue, 18 December 2012 03:03 UTC

Return-Path: <gwz@net-zen.net>
X-Original-To: xrblock@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: xrblock@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 16E1421F84A1 for <xrblock@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 17 Dec 2012 19:03:32 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id H4eKtXrfAwSo for <xrblock@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 17 Dec 2012 19:03:30 -0800 (PST)
Received: from sg2plout10-01.prod.sin2.secureserver.net (sg2plout10-01.prod.sin2.secureserver.net [182.50.145.4]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 409DF21F848B for <xrblock@ietf.org>; Mon, 17 Dec 2012 19:03:29 -0800 (PST)
Received: (qmail 5246 invoked from network); 18 Dec 2012 03:03:24 -0000
Received: from unknown (110.169.202.60) by sg2plout10-01.prod.sin2.secureserver.net (182.50.145.4) with ESMTP; 18 Dec 2012 03:03:24 -0000
Message-ID: <50CFDCFA.6020301@net-zen.net>
Date: Tue, 18 Dec 2012 10:03:22 +0700
From: Glen Zorn <gwz@net-zen.net>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/17.0 Thunderbird/17.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Qin Wu <bill.wu@huawei.com>
References: <C3759687E4991243A1A0BD44EAC823034DFB915B07@BE235.mail.lan> <50CFCBF9.3070301@net-zen.net> <A4AC6E76F05F423DA11BFB0DCE52FE0C@china.huawei.com>
In-Reply-To: <A4AC6E76F05F423DA11BFB0DCE52FE0C@china.huawei.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Tue, 18 Dec 2012 02:01:04 -0800
Cc: Jonathan Lennox <jonathan@vidyo.com>, xrblock@ietf.org, draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-discard@tools.ietf.org, Glen Zorn <gwz@net-zen.net>, mmusic@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [xrblock] SDP Directorate review of draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-discard
X-BeenThere: xrblock@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Metric Blocks for use with RTCP's Extended Report Framework working group discussion list <xrblock.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/xrblock>, <mailto:xrblock-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/xrblock>
List-Post: <mailto:xrblock@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:xrblock-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/xrblock>, <mailto:xrblock-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 18 Dec 2012 03:03:32 -0000

On 12/18/2012 09:20 AM, Qin Wu wrote:

> I guess the reference "RFC3711  section 5" Jonathan mentioned should
 > be corrected as "RFC3611 section 5". If my understanding is correct,
 > what Jonathan suggested is to have the following change: OLD TEXT: "
 > RFC 3611 defines the use of SDP (Session Description Protocol)
 > [RFC4566] for signaling the use of RTCP XR blocks. XR blocks MAY be
 > used without prior signaling.
 >
 > " NEW TEXT: " RFC 3611 defines the use of SDP (Session Description
 > Protocol) [RFC4566] for signaling the use of RTCP XR blocks. However
 > XR blocks MAY be used without prior signaling (see section 5 of
 > RFC3611). " Please correct me if I am wrong.

My comment still stands: the existing text is not confusing & needn't be 
changed.

...