Re: [xrblock] I-D Action: draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-summary-stat-04.txt

Colin Perkins <csp@csperkins.org> Tue, 18 December 2012 15:37 UTC

Return-Path: <csp@csperkins.org>
X-Original-To: xrblock@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: xrblock@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0B87121F8A5A for <xrblock@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 18 Dec 2012 07:37:43 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -106.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-106.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id IuZEwyrR4y4k for <xrblock@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 18 Dec 2012 07:37:41 -0800 (PST)
Received: from balrog.mythic-beasts.com (balrog.mythic-beasts.com [93.93.130.6]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4BF9321F8A0A for <xrblock@ietf.org>; Tue, 18 Dec 2012 07:37:32 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [130.209.247.112] (helo=mangole.dcs.gla.ac.uk) by balrog.mythic-beasts.com with esmtpsa (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <csp@csperkins.org>) id 1TkzEZ-00010H-BE; Tue, 18 Dec 2012 15:37:31 +0000
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1283)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252
From: Colin Perkins <csp@csperkins.org>
X-Priority: 3
In-Reply-To: <34AFF222E89A4DF9A8E97A3FF0E93344@china.huawei.com>
Date: Tue, 18 Dec 2012 15:37:30 +0000
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <937A0325-0272-4724-84DF-AE37580C5A90@csperkins.org>
References: <20121214063850.23462.77281.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <34AFF222E89A4DF9A8E97A3FF0E93344@china.huawei.com>
To: Qin Wu <bill.wu@huawei.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1283)
X-BlackCat-Spam-Score: -13
X-Mythic-Debug: Threshold = On =
Cc: xrblock@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [xrblock] I-D Action: draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-summary-stat-04.txt
X-BeenThere: xrblock@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Metric Blocks for use with RTCP's Extended Report Framework working group discussion list <xrblock.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/xrblock>, <mailto:xrblock-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/xrblock>
List-Post: <mailto:xrblock@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:xrblock-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/xrblock>, <mailto:xrblock-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 18 Dec 2012 15:37:43 -0000

On 14 Dec 2012, at 06:43, Qin Wu wrote:
> On 14 December , 2012 2:38 PM, Internet-Drafts@ietf.org wrote:
>> 
>> A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories.
>> This draft is a work item of the Metric Blocks for use with RTCP's Extended Report Framework Working Group of the IETF.
>> 
>> Title           : RTP Control Protocol (RTCP) Extended Report (XR) Blocks for Summary Statistics Metrics Reporting
>> Author(s)       : Glen Zorn
>>                         Roland Schott
>>                         Qin Wu
>>                         Rachel Huang
>> Filename        : draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-summary-stat-04.txt
>> Pages           : 15
>> Date            : 2012-12-13
>> 
>> Abstract:
>>  This document defines three RTP Control Protcol (RTCP) Extended
>>  Report (XR) Blocks that allow the reporting of loss, duplication and
>>  discard summary statistics metrics in a range of RTP applications.
>> 
>> 
>> The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is:
>> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-summary-stat
>> 
> [Qin]: We have just submitted one update of Summary Stat draft. We believe this revision has addressed the comments we received during the recent WGLC.

One editorial fix: At the end of Section 3.2.2, the text “In order for the Burst/Gap Discard Summary Statistics Block to be meaningful, 2 instances of the Discard Count block with DT=1 and DT=2 MUST be included in the same RTCP compound packet as the Burst/Gap Discard Summary Statistics Block.” ought to say “...included in the same RTCP XR packet as the...”?



-- 
Colin Perkins
http://csperkins.org/