Re: [xrblock] FW: I-D Action:draft-alvestrand-rtcweb-stats-registry-00.txt

"Romascanu, Dan (Dan)" <dromasca@avaya.com> Tue, 25 September 2012 09:45 UTC

Return-Path: <dromasca@avaya.com>
X-Original-To: xrblock@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: xrblock@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CC6FB21F88A6 for <xrblock@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 25 Sep 2012 02:45:15 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -103.275
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-103.275 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.324, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id jtAr9kvJEuxX for <xrblock@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 25 Sep 2012 02:45:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from de307622-de-outbound.net.avaya.com (de307622-de-outbound.net.avaya.com [198.152.71.100]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5773921F888E for <xrblock@ietf.org>; Tue, 25 Sep 2012 02:45:14 -0700 (PDT)
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AgAFABR8YVDGmAcF/2dsb2JhbABFvmiBCIIgAQEBAQMBAQEPHgo0BBMEAgEIDQEDBAEBCwIEDAsBBgEmHwgBCAEBBAESCAEZh2MLmzqMWpB/ixuFYmADlnqEboUahQeCaQ
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.80,481,1344225600"; d="scan'208";a="326053327"
Received: from unknown (HELO co300216-co-erhwest.avaya.com) ([198.152.7.5]) by de307622-de-outbound.net.avaya.com with ESMTP; 25 Sep 2012 05:40:00 -0400
Received: from unknown (HELO 307622ANEX5.global.avaya.com) ([135.64.140.12]) by co300216-co-erhwest-out.avaya.com with ESMTP; 25 Sep 2012 05:37:35 -0400
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5
Content-class: urn:content-classes:message
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2012 11:45:08 +0200
Message-ID: <EDC652A26FB23C4EB6384A4584434A04081AB4AD@307622ANEX5.global.avaya.com>
In-Reply-To: <3C8D9E30D9654AD0A3E1F21668D1CBFB@china.huawei.com>
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
Thread-Topic: [xrblock] FW: I-D Action:draft-alvestrand-rtcweb-stats-registry-00.txt
Thread-Index: Ac2aw/K+gPuGGhMpSLG4zQmcF7/TGQAPiUsA
References: <EDC652A26FB23C4EB6384A4584434A04081AB2D9@307622ANEX5.global.avaya.com> <3C8D9E30D9654AD0A3E1F21668D1CBFB@china.huawei.com>
From: "Romascanu, Dan (Dan)" <dromasca@avaya.com>
To: Qin Wu <bill.wu@huawei.com>, xrblock@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [xrblock] FW: I-D Action:draft-alvestrand-rtcweb-stats-registry-00.txt
X-BeenThere: xrblock@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Metric Blocks for use with RTCP's Extended Report Framework working group discussion list <xrblock.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/xrblock>, <mailto:xrblock-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/xrblock>
List-Post: <mailto:xrblock@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:xrblock-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/xrblock>, <mailto:xrblock-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2012 09:45:16 -0000

Hi Qin,

Would you like me to forward your comments to rtcweb@ietf.org? You can
also subscribe to the list to follow the responses and participate in
the discussions, but I should warn you that performance statistics are a
fraction of the many problems this very active WG have on their hands. 

Dan



> -----Original Message-----
> From: Qin Wu [mailto:bill.wu@huawei.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2012 4:17 AM
> To: Romascanu, Dan (Dan); xrblock@ietf.org
> Subject: Re: [xrblock] FW: I-D Action:draft-alvestrand-rtcweb-stats-
> registry-00.txt
> 
> Interesting -00 draft.
> Have a quick look at this draft, I have the folowing comments:
> 1. Jitter should also refers to PDV draft since PDV draft provide
> another two measurement methods with different measurement precision
> which are different from "inter-arrival jitter" described in RFC3550.
> In the early version of PDV draft, we also accomodate "inter-arrival
> jitter" and support reporting inter-arrival jitter. However we remove
> inter-arrival jitter from this draft based on WG review since inter-
> arrival jitter use different measurement unit and has wider range.
> 2.ReceivedPacketCount
> Loss RLE report block can be used to report the packet received. It is
> more staightfoward to calculate ReceivedPacket Count based on  Loss
RLE
> report block defined in RFC3611 rather than based on MIB information
> defined in RFC2959. Also in some case, WebClient may not support SNMP.
> So I suggest to refer to section 4.1, RFC3611.
> 3. RecevedOctetCount
> Same as RecevedPacketCount. I think Loss RLE report block also can be
> used to calculate RecevedOctetCount.
> It is better to refer to section 4.1, RFC3611.
> 4. Section 4.2 Transport variable
> It is not clear how Transport variable is relate to Variables from
basic
> RTCP SR/RR defined in section 4.1, how transport vaiable is
calculated,
> e.g., what's the relationship between ReceivedPackets and
> ReceivedPacketcount? Are they the same variable?
> Is 4 transport variable defined in section 4.2 sufficient to measure
the
> performance of media stream? Why not refer to some variable defined in
> XRBLOCK WG?
> 
> Regards!
> -Qin
> 
>  ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Romascanu, Dan (Dan)" <dromasca@avaya.com>
> To: <xrblock@ietf.org>
> Sent: Monday, September 24, 2012 7:48 PM
> Subject: [xrblock] FW: I-D Action:draft-alvestrand-rtcweb-stats-
> registry-00.txt
> 
> 
> >I believe that this I-D (individual submission targeting the RTCWEB
WG)
> > is of interest for some of the folks who participate in XRBLOCK.
> > Reaching consistency between the metrics used by RTCP XR and RTCWEB
> > (when relevant) seems to be desirable.
> >
> > Regards,
> >
> > Dan
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: i-d-announce-bounces@ietf.org
> > [mailto:i-d-announce-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of
> > internet-drafts@ietf.org
> > Sent: Monday, September 24, 2012 12:17 PM
> > To: i-d-announce@ietf.org
> > Subject: I-D Action: draft-alvestrand-rtcweb-stats-registry-00.txt
> >
> >
> > A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts
> > directories.
> >
> >
> > Title           : A Registry for WebRTC statistics identifiers
> > Author(s)       : Harald T. Alvestrand
> > Filename        : draft-alvestrand-rtcweb-stats-registry-00.txt
> > Pages           : 8
> > Date            : 2012-09-24
> >
> > Abstract:
> >   This memo describes a registration procedure for statistics
> >   identifiers used in the WebRTC Javascript API to access
statistical
> >   information about a PeerConnection.
> >
> >   It also gives some identifiers that will, when approved, form the
> >   initial content of this registry.
> >
> >
> >
> > The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is:
> > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-alvestrand-rtcweb-stats-
> registry
> >
> > There's also a htmlized version available at:
> > http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-alvestrand-rtcweb-stats-registry-00
> >
> >
> > Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at:
> > ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > I-D-Announce mailing list
> > I-D-Announce@ietf.org
> > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/i-d-announce
> > Internet-Draft directories: http://www.ietf.org/shadow.html or
> > ftp://ftp.ietf.org/ietf/1shadow-sites.txt
> > _______________________________________________
> > xrblock mailing list
> > xrblock@ietf.org
> > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/xrblock