Re: [xrblock] WGLC for draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-loss-conceal-05

Yes, I agree with you. Thanks!

-----Original Message-----
From: Roni Even [mailto:ron.even.tlv@gmail.com] 
Sent: Monday, June 03, 2013 8:11 PM
To: Qin Wu; 'Shida Schubert'; 'xrblock'
Cc: 'xrblock-chairs'
Subject: RE: [xrblock] WGLC for draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-loss-conceal-05

Hi Qin,
This is OK, it should be mentioned in the document that this parameter is
declared by the offerer.
Roni

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Qin Wu [mailto:bill.wu@huawei.com]
> Sent: 03 June, 2013 3:04 PM
> To: Roni Even; 'Shida Schubert'; 'xrblock'
> Cc: 'xrblock-chairs'
> Subject: RE: [xrblock] WGLC for draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-loss-conceal-05
> 
> Hi, Roni:
> Please see my reply inline.
> 
> Regards!
> -Qin
> -----Original Message-----
> From: xrblock-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:xrblock-bounces@ietf.org] On
> Behalf Of Roni Even
> Sent: Friday, May 31, 2013 10:51 PM
> To: 'Shida Schubert'; 'xrblock'
> Cc: 'xrblock-chairs'
> Subject: Re: [xrblock] WGLC for draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-loss-conceal-05
> 
> Hi,
> I reviewed the document and it look good. I have one comment.
> In the offer answer section it will be good to explain if the threshold is
> declared by the offer or is it negotiated.
> 
> [Qin]: Since media sent by the entity that  generated the SDP in one
> direction, I think the threshold is declared by the offer.
> 
> Small nit in the beginning of section 4
> "This sub-block described here are intended" should be " This sub-block
> described here is intended"
> 
> [Qin]: Good catch, thanks.
> 
> Roni
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: xrblock-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:xrblock-bounces@ietf.org] On
> > Behalf Of Shida Schubert
> > Sent: 29 May, 2013 7:54 PM
> > To: xrblock
> > Cc: xrblock-chairs
> > Subject: [xrblock] WGLC for draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-loss-conceal-05
> >
> > This is an announcement of a 2 weeks XRBLOCK WG last call on "Report
> > Block for Concealment metrics Reporting on Audio Applications"
> > prior to requesting publication of the document as a proposed standard.
> >
> >  As per discussion at the last meeting, we are running a second WGLC
> > on
> this
> > draft.
> >
> > Please send your comments, including nits, to the list by the
> >
> > 12th of June
> >
> > If you read the draft and you see no issues, concerns, or nits, please
> express
> > the fact that you have no issue progressing the draft on the list as
well.
> >
> > The latest version can be found here:
> >
> > http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-loss-conceal-05
> >
> > Regards
> >
> > Shida as co-chair
> > _______________________________________________
> > xrblock mailing list
> > xrblock@ietf.org
> > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/xrblock
> 
> _______________________________________________
> xrblock mailing list
> xrblock@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/xrblock