[xrblock] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC6958 (4525)

RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org> Fri, 06 November 2015 01:08 UTC

Return-Path: <wwwrun@rfc-editor.org>
X-Original-To: xrblock@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: xrblock@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 99EED1A9059 for <xrblock@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 5 Nov 2015 17:08:10 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -101.912
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-101.912 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id A0HD1JFwcEyk for <xrblock@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 5 Nov 2015 17:08:09 -0800 (PST)
Received: from rfc-editor.org (rfc-editor.org [IPv6:2001:1900:3001:11::31]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0FADA1A8AAA for <xrblock@ietf.org>; Thu, 5 Nov 2015 17:08:09 -0800 (PST)
Received: by rfc-editor.org (Postfix, from userid 30) id CCF68180472; Thu, 5 Nov 2015 17:07:04 -0800 (PST)
To: alan.d.clark@telchemy.com, zhangyx@sttri.com.cn, zhaojing@sttri.com.cn, sunseawq@huawei.com, ben@nostrum.com, alissa@cooperw.in, dromasca@avaya.com, shida@ntt-at.com
X-PHP-Originating-Script: 30:errata_mail_lib.php
From: RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>
Message-Id: <20151106010704.CCF68180472@rfc-editor.org>
Date: Thu, 5 Nov 2015 17:07:04 -0800 (PST)
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/xrblock/uj-NFto49vhB9wiYSaSDLyc-ksk>
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Thu, 05 Nov 2015 17:11:29 -0800
Cc: rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org, varun@callstats.io, xrblock@ietf.org
Subject: [xrblock] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC6958 (4525)
X-BeenThere: xrblock@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Metric Blocks for use with RTCP's Extended Report Framework working group discussion list <xrblock.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/xrblock>, <mailto:xrblock-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/xrblock/>
List-Post: <mailto:xrblock@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:xrblock-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/xrblock>, <mailto:xrblock-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 06 Nov 2015 01:08:10 -0000

The following errata report has been submitted for RFC6958,
"RTP Control Protocol (RTCP) Extended Report (XR) Block for Burst/Gap Loss Metric Reporting".

--------------------------------------
You may review the report below and at:
http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata_search.php?rfc=6958&eid=4525

--------------------------------------
Type: Technical
Reported by: Varun Singh <varun@callstats.io>

Section: 3.1

Original Text
-------------
      0               1               2               3               4
      0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 0
      +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
      |     BT=33     |   Reserved    |      Block length = 4         |
      +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
      |                       SSRC of Source                          |
      +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
      |       begin_seq               |          end_seq              |
      +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
      |  Post-repair loss count       |     Repaired loss count       |
      +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+


Block length: 16 bits

      This field is in accordance with the definition in [RFC3611].  In
      this report block, it MUST be set to 4.  The block MUST be
      discarded if the block length is set to a different value.

Corrected Text
--------------
      0               1               2               3               4
      0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 0
      +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
      |     BT=33     |   Reserved    |      Block length = 3         |
      +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
      |                       SSRC of Source                          |
      +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
      |       begin_seq               |          end_seq              |
      +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
      |  Post-repair loss count       |     Repaired loss count       |
      +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+


Block length: 16 bits

      This field is in accordance with the definition in [RFC3611].  In
      this report block, it MUST be set to 3.  The block MUST be
      discarded if the block length is set to a different value.

Notes
-----
The block length is calculated and indicated incorrectly in two places: the packet format and the definition of the block length.

Instructions:
-------------
This erratum is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please
use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or
rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party (IESG)
can log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary. 

--------------------------------------
RFC6958 (draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-burst-gap-loss-12)
--------------------------------------
Title               : RTP Control Protocol (RTCP) Extended Report (XR) Block for Burst/Gap Loss Metric Reporting
Publication Date    : May 2013
Author(s)           : A. Clark, S. Zhang, J. Zhao, Q. Wu, Ed.
Category            : PROPOSED STANDARD
Source              : Metric Blocks for use with RTCPs Extended Report Framework RAI
Area                : Real-time Applications and Infrastructure
Stream              : IETF
Verifying Party     : IESG