[xrblock] Fw: I-D Action: draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-loss-conceal-05.txt
Qin Wu <bill.wu@huawei.com> Mon, 01 April 2013 07:56 UTC
Return-Path: <bill.wu@huawei.com>
X-Original-To: xrblock@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: xrblock@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6448021F86F5 for <xrblock@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 1 Apr 2013 00:56:18 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.432
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.432 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_40=-0.185, MIME_BASE64_TEXT=1.753, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id afSFPqDP5w9y for <xrblock@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 1 Apr 2013 00:56:18 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lhrrgout.huawei.com (lhrrgout.huawei.com [194.213.3.17]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4DA9E21F8630 for <xrblock@ietf.org>; Mon, 1 Apr 2013 00:56:17 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from 172.18.7.190 (EHLO lhreml204-edg.china.huawei.com) ([172.18.7.190]) by lhrrg01-dlp.huawei.com (MOS 4.3.5-GA FastPath queued) with ESMTP id ARH42648; Mon, 01 Apr 2013 07:56:15 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from LHREML402-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.201.5.241) by lhreml204-edg.china.huawei.com (172.18.7.223) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.1.323.7; Mon, 1 Apr 2013 08:56:08 +0100
Received: from SZXEML449-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.82.67.192) by lhreml402-hub.china.huawei.com (10.201.5.241) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.1.323.7; Mon, 1 Apr 2013 08:56:13 +0100
Received: from w53375 (10.138.41.149) by szxeml449-hub.china.huawei.com (10.82.67.192) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.1.323.7; Mon, 1 Apr 2013 15:56:03 +0800
Message-ID: <B129399BBB644A59979FEE586D9EE613@china.huawei.com>
From: Qin Wu <bill.wu@huawei.com>
To: xrblock@ietf.org
Date: Mon, 01 Apr 2013 15:56:02 +0800
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.5931
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.6109
X-Originating-IP: [10.138.41.149]
X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected
Subject: [xrblock] Fw: I-D Action: draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-loss-conceal-05.txt
X-BeenThere: xrblock@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Metric Blocks for use with RTCP's Extended Report Framework working group discussion list <xrblock.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/xrblock>, <mailto:xrblock-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/xrblock>
List-Post: <mailto:xrblock@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:xrblock-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/xrblock>, <mailto:xrblock-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 01 Apr 2013 07:56:18 -0000
On 25 March , 2012 4:01 PM, Internet-Drafts@ietf.org wrote: > > A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories. > This draft is a work item of the Metric Blocks for use with RTCP's Extended Report Framework Working Group of the IETF. > > Title : RTCP XR Report Block for Concealment metrics Reporting on Audio Applications > Author(s) : Alan Clark > Glen Zorn > Claire Bi > Qin Wu > Filename : draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-loss-conceal-05.txt > Pages : 29 > Date : 2013-03-25 > > Abstract: > This document defines two RTCP XR Report Blocks that allows the > reporting of loss concealment metrics for audio applications of RTP. > > > The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is: > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-loss-conceal > > There's also a htmlized version available at: > http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-loss-conceal-05 > > A diff from the previous version is available at: > http://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-loss-conceal-05 [Qin]: One minor update based on discussion during Orlando IETF meeting. The main change is to add appendix to apply RFC6390 templates to metrics specified in this draft and clarify Enhanced usage by referering to RFC3611. To chairs: Chairs, we believe this update is ready for WGLC.