Re: [xrblock] meeting at IETF-91

I concur with Varun. Besides, I also would like to discuss the video loss concealment draft which got some interests in last meeting.

BR,
Rachel

> -----Original Message-----
> From: xrblock [mailto:xrblock-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Varun Singh
> Sent: Friday, September 05, 2014 11:59 AM
> To: Romascanu, Dan (Dan)
> Cc: xrblock
> Subject: Re: [xrblock] meeting at IETF-91
> 
> Hi all,
> 
> It would certainly be useful to have a session. Harald and I are putting together
> a W3C contribution to move the statsAPI forward based on the information in
> the w3c wiki. Discussion around the xrblock-rtcweb draft would be important
> within that context.
> 
> Cheers,
> Varun
> 
> On Thu, Sep 4, 2014 at 3:51 PM, Romascanu, Dan (Dan)
> <dromasca@avaya.com> wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> >
> >
> > It’s time (already!) to submit a request for a meeting slot at IETF-91.
> >
> >
> >
> > Should we ask for one session of one hour – as at IETF-90?
> >
> >
> >
> > The current list of conflicts includes:
> >
> >
> >
> > trill siprec rtcweb raiarea payload opsawg opsarea netmod netconf
> > mmusic lmap ippm insipid codec bmwg bfcpbis avtext avtcore tsvarea
> > sacm alto spring pce mpls i2rs idr
> >
> >
> >
> > Are there other conflicts to avoid? Other special requests? Different
> > proposals?
> >
> >
> >
> > Thanks and Regards,
> >
> >
> >
> > Dan
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > xrblock mailing list
> > xrblock@ietf.org
> > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/xrblock
> >
> 
> 
> 
> --
> http://www.netlab.tkk.fi/~varun/
> 
> _______________________________________________
> xrblock mailing list
> xrblock@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/xrblock