Re: [xrblock] Comment on draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-jb
"Claire Bi(jiayu)" <bijy@sttri.com.cn> Thu, 11 October 2012 13:22 UTC
Return-Path: <bijy@sttri.com.cn>
X-Original-To: xrblock@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: xrblock@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DB7E821F8734 for <xrblock@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 11 Oct 2012 06:22:30 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 0.159
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.159 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=1.300, BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MIME_HTML_ONLY=1.457]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id xLufSkhD0G2h for <xrblock@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 11 Oct 2012 06:22:30 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from corp.21cn.com (corp.forptr.21cn.com [121.14.129.40]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CB07E21F8731 for <xrblock@ietf.org>; Thu, 11 Oct 2012 06:22:27 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ip?218.92.227.106? (unknown [10.27.101.10]) by corp.21cn.com (HERMES) with ESMTP id 347E31A481B; Thu, 11 Oct 2012 21:22:17 +0800 (CST)
HMM_ATTACHE_NUM: 0000
HMM_SOURCE_IP: wmail.10.27.101.10.536896692
HMM_SOURCE_TYPE: WEBMAIL
Received: from ip<218.92.227.106> ([218.92.227.106]) by 21CN-entas10(MEDUSA 10.27.101.10) with ESMTP id 1349961737.30653 for bill.wu@huawei.com ; Thu Oct 11 21:22:22 2012
0/X-Total-Score: 0:
2/X-Total-Score: 3:
X-FILTER-SCORE: to=<838a8d8d4f98966189968298868a4f84908e9993838d90848c618a8695874f909388>, score=<1349961742l0DOgr3uC8llOllgllrll3pR6hwGfvFIpphppwppGppf>
Date: Thu, 11 Oct 2012 21:22:17 +0800
From: "Claire Bi(jiayu)" <bijy@sttri.com.cn>
To: Qin Wu <bill.wu@huawei.com>, xrblock <xrblock@ietf.org>
Message-ID: <217844971.4351349961737519.JavaMail.hermes@ent-web5>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----=_Part_497_399025759.1349961737223"
HMM_WEBCLN_IP: 10.27.10.85
X-HERMES-SENDMODE: normal
X-HERMES-SET: KoH0oguRsun5ALVzckz3EqaqqOumqw==
Subject: Re: [xrblock] Comment on draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-jb
X-BeenThere: xrblock@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Metric Blocks for use with RTCP's Extended Report Framework working group discussion list <xrblock.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/xrblock>, <mailto:xrblock-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/xrblock>
List-Post: <mailto:xrblock@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:xrblock-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/xrblock>, <mailto:xrblock-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 11 Oct 2012 13:22:31 -0000
发件人:Qin Wu "bill.wu@huawei.com"
时 间:2012/10/11 08:42:42 星期四
收件人:"Claire Bi(jiayu)" "bijy@sttri.com.cn", xrblock "xrblock@ietf.org"
抄送人:
主 题:Re: [xrblock] Comment on draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-jb
----- Original Message -----From: bijy@sttri.com.cn" href="mailto:bijy@sttri.com.cn" rel="nofollow">Claire Bi(jiayu)To: xrblock@ietf.org" href="mailto:xrblock@ietf.org" rel="nofollow">xrblockSent: Wednesday, October 10, 2012 10:28 PMSubject: [xrblock] Comment on draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-jb
Hi,
I've read draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-jb and think it is pretty much in a good shape.
However,I have one comment to the section 1.4. It seems section 1.4 is still incomplete. It is proposed to add some use cases and further explanation in this section.
Besides this, I think this draft is ready for going for Last Call in the WG.
Regards!
Claire Bi
_______________________________________________
xrblock mailing list
xrblock@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/xrblock
- [xrblock] Comment on draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-jb Claire Bi(jiayu)
- Re: [xrblock] Comment on draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-… Qin Wu
- Re: [xrblock] Comment on draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-… Claire Bi(jiayu)