IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [xrblock] Burst Gap drafts Status

Qin Wu <bill.wu@huawei.com> Wed, 11 July 2012 02:54 UTC

Return-Path: <bill.wu@huawei.com>
X-Original-To: xrblock@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: xrblock@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id ED64711E80B3 for <xrblock@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 10 Jul 2012 19:54:09 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.918
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.918 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.796, BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_FONT_FACE_BAD=0.884, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id wsVlrDlNOzqV for <xrblock@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 10 Jul 2012 19:54:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from dfwrgout.huawei.com (dfwrgout.huawei.com [206.16.17.72]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 064C611E809F for <xrblock@ietf.org>; Tue, 10 Jul 2012 19:54:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from 172.18.9.243 (EHLO dfweml202-edg.china.huawei.com) ([172.18.9.243]) by dfwrg01-dlp.huawei.com (MOS 4.2.3-GA FastPath) with ESMTP id AHX50422; Tue, 10 Jul 2012 22:54:38 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from DFWEML404-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.193.5.203) by dfweml202-edg.china.huawei.com (172.18.9.108) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.1.323.3; Tue, 10 Jul 2012 19:52:09 -0700
Received: from SZXEML412-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.82.67.91) by dfweml404-hub.china.huawei.com (10.193.5.203) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.1.323.3; Tue, 10 Jul 2012 19:52:07 -0700
Received: from w53375 (10.138.41.149) by szxeml412-hub.china.huawei.com (10.82.67.91) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.1.323.3; Wed, 11 Jul 2012 10:51:10 +0800
Message-ID: <C3093C8DCFE2405EA662C12ABC42229E@china.huawei.com>
From: Qin Wu <bill.wu@huawei.com>
To: "Romascanu, Dan (Dan)" <dromasca@avaya.com>, "Claire Bi(jiayu)" <bijy@sttri.com.cn>, xrblock <xrblock@ietf.org>
References: <136707783.24291341896234959.JavaMail.hermes@ent-web2><DCA5E33723DD4E46BD2B76B9C1BB5D6F@china.huawei.com> <EDC652A26FB23C4EB6384A4584434A0407CC38AE@307622ANEX5.global.avaya.com>
Date: Wed, 11 Jul 2012 10:51:08 +0800
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0207_01CD5F53.14342B60"
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.5931
x-mimeole: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.6109
X-Originating-IP: [10.138.41.149]
X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected
Subject: Re: [xrblock] Burst Gap drafts Status
X-BeenThere: xrblock@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Metric Blocks for use with RTCP's Extended Report Framework working group discussion list <xrblock.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/xrblock>, <mailto:xrblock-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/xrblock>
List-Post: <mailto:xrblock@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:xrblock-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/xrblock>, <mailto:xrblock-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 11 Jul 2012 02:54:10 -0000

We have submitted revision to Burst Gap Loss draft and Burst Gap Discard draft to address one minor comment from Claire.
http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-burst-gap-loss-02
http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-burst-gap-discard-04

Chairs, please use these two versions as basline for WGLC. Thanks

Regards!
-Qin
  ----- Original Message ----- 
  From: Romascanu, Dan (Dan) 
  To: Qin Wu ; Claire Bi(jiayu) ; xrblock 
  Sent: Tuesday, July 10, 2012 9:35 PM
  Subject: Re: [xrblock] Burst Gap drafts Status


  Hi,

   

  I plan to start the WGLC soon in order to gather feedback before the IETF meeting. Any pending comments can be queued and will be considered together with the other WGLC comments. 

   

  Regards,

   

  Dan

   

   

   

  From: xrblock-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:xrblock-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Qin Wu
  Sent: Tuesday, July 10, 2012 8:41 AM
  To: Claire Bi(jiayu); xrblock
  Subject: Re: [xrblock] Burst Gap drafts Status

   

  Hi,Claire:

  If my memory is correct, these two drafts are now in the Queue of drafts for WGLC.

  Regarding your quick comment, yes, these two drafts should be updated to make

  consistent with other XR drafts. 

  Thanks!

   

  Regards!

  -Qin

    ----- Original Message ----- 

    From: Claire Bi(jiayu) 

    To: xrblock 

    Sent: Tuesday, July 10, 2012 12:57 PM

    Subject: [xrblock] Burst Gap drafts Status

     

    Hi,all: 


    I'm wondering what's the status of Burst Gap drafts? 
    I have reviewed draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-burst-gap-discard 
    and draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-burst-gap-loss and have one comment that is applied to both document. 


    1 bit Interval metric flag in the metric block is not consistent with other XR drafts that complete WGLC. 
    I think this issue should be fixed before going for WGLC. 

    Regards! 


    Claire Bi 


----------------------------------------------------------------------------

    _______________________________________________
    xrblock mailing list
    xrblock@ietf.org
    https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/xrblock



------------------------------------------------------------------------------


  _______________________________________________
  xrblock mailing list
  xrblock@ietf.org
  https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/xrblock

v2.26.15 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status