Re: [xrblock] [MMUSIC] SDP Directorate: Review of draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-decodability-07

Qin Wu <bill.wu@huawei.com> Mon, 25 February 2013 10:41 UTC

Return-Path: <bill.wu@huawei.com>
X-Original-To: xrblock@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: xrblock@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7434021F927D; Mon, 25 Feb 2013 02:41:37 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -5.033
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.033 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.187, BAYES_00=-2.599, MIME_BASE64_TEXT=1.753, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 8zG6E4DufUop; Mon, 25 Feb 2013 02:41:37 -0800 (PST)
Received: from lhrrgout.huawei.com (lhrrgout.huawei.com [194.213.3.17]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7EC7C21F9240; Mon, 25 Feb 2013 02:41:29 -0800 (PST)
Received: from 172.18.7.190 (EHLO lhreml203-edg.china.huawei.com) ([172.18.7.190]) by lhrrg02-dlp.huawei.com (MOS 4.3.5-GA FastPath queued) with ESMTP id AOT68663; Mon, 25 Feb 2013 10:41:28 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from LHREML406-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.201.5.243) by lhreml203-edg.huawei.com (172.18.7.221) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.1.323.7; Mon, 25 Feb 2013 10:41:24 +0000
Received: from SZXEML415-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.82.67.154) by lhreml406-hub.china.huawei.com (10.201.5.243) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.1.323.7; Mon, 25 Feb 2013 10:41:24 +0000
Received: from w53375 (10.138.41.149) by szxeml415-hub.china.huawei.com (10.82.67.154) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.1.323.7; Mon, 25 Feb 2013 18:41:10 +0800
Message-ID: <3F9803778CF045B8BF27AD752032EB92@china.huawei.com>
From: Qin Wu <bill.wu@huawei.com>
To: "Ali C. Begen (abegen)" <abegen@cisco.com>, "Huangyihong (Rachel)" <rachel.huang@huawei.com>, <draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-decodability@tools.ietf.org>
References: <C15918F2FCDA0243A7C919DA7C4BE9940CF2A53F@xmb-aln-x01.cisco.com>
Date: Mon, 25 Feb 2013 18:41:10 +0800
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.5931
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.6109
X-Originating-IP: [10.138.41.149]
X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected
Cc: mmusic@ietf.org, xrblock@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [xrblock] [MMUSIC] SDP Directorate: Review of draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-decodability-07
X-BeenThere: xrblock@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Metric Blocks for use with RTCP's Extended Report Framework working group discussion list <xrblock.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/xrblock>, <mailto:xrblock-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/xrblock>
List-Post: <mailto:xrblock@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:xrblock-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/xrblock>, <mailto:xrblock-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 25 Feb 2013 10:41:37 -0000

Fixed.
The diff is:
http://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-decodability-09

Regards!
-Qin
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Ali C. Begen (abegen)" <abegen@cisco.com>
To: "Huangyihong (Rachel)" <rachel.huang@huawei.com>om>; <draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-decodability@tools.ietf.org>
Cc: <xrblock@ietf.org>rg>; <mmusic@ietf.org>
Sent: Monday, February 25, 2013 5:48 PM
Subject: Re: [xrblock] [MMUSIC] SDP Directorate: Review of draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-decodability-07


-----Original Message-----
From: "Huangyihong   (Rachel)" <rachel.huang@huawei.com>
Date: Monday, February 25, 2013 3:28 AM
To: "Ali C. Begen" <abegen@cisco.com>om>,
"draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-decodability@tools.ietf.org"
<draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-decodability@tools.ietf.org>
Cc: "mmusic@ietf.org" <mmusic@ietf.org>rg>, "gonzalo.camarillo@ericsson.com"
<gonzalo.camarillo@ericsson.com>
Subject: RE: [MMUSIC] SDP Directorate: Review of
draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-decodability-07

>Technical Issues:
>-----------------
>1) I am puzzled why you named the new block as "non-psi-ts-decodability".
>It does not follow what you have in the title. I also did not get the
>"non" part.
>
>[Rachel]: To get consistent with the title we used, how about we propose
>to change the block name in SDP as "ts-psi-indep-decodability"?

I see that you already submitted a revision. Your current title says:

RTP Control Protocol (RTCP) Extended Report (XR) Block for MPEG2 Program
      Specific Information (PSI) Independent Transport Stream (TS)
                Decodability Statistics Metric reporting


This still does not make sense to me. "Transport Stream" should be before
"Program Specific Information". My other comment on the title was it
should be "Š Metrics Reporting" not "Metric reporting".

-acbegen

_______________________________________________
xrblock mailing list
xrblock@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/xrblock