Re: [yaco-liaison-tool] The liaison tool: Status Update

[Eliot Lear <[e-mail]>]

Hi Emilio and all,

I wonder if we could have a call to catch me up on all that is going on
with the tool?  Would that be possible sometime next week?

Eliot

On 4/7/11 11:37 AM, "Emilio A. Sánchez" wrote:
>
>    Hi,
>
>    Right now the field person of the LiaisonDetail model stores the
> PersonOrOrgInfo of the user that creates the liaison. The real one so
> if the secretariat is sending a liaisons the person field has the
> secretariat user person.
>
>    But this info is not used to grant any privilege over the liaisons.
>
>    Best,
>
> El 07/04/11 11:16, Henrik Levkowetz escribió:
>> Hi Emilio,
>>
>> I'm not sure you, Patrik and myself are talking about the same thing
>> here.  See more below.
>>
>> On 2011-04-07 10:54 "Emilio A. Sánchez" said:
>>>      Hi.
>>>
>>> El 07/04/11 10:25, Henrik Levkowetz escribió:
>>>> Hi Emilio,
>>>>
>>>> On 2011-04-06 16:03 "Emilio A. Sánchez" said:
>>>> ...
>>>>
>>>>>       I don't understand what data want's to edit Patrik when he
>>>>> say 'who
>>>>> holds the action item'. If he refers to the person who can 'take
>>>>> care'
>>>>> of a liaison, this person is selected automatically.
>>>>
>>>> But if the SDO Liaison Manager is changing, then liaisons which still
>>>> need to be taken care of will need to be updated, no?
>>>
>>>      I'm revising the code. The persons who are allowed to 'take
>>> care' of
>>> a liaison are:
>>>
>>>      * The secretariat (always)
>>>      * Any person whose email is listed under 'cc', 'reply_to', 'poc',
>>> 'response_contact', 'technical_contact' and the submitter. Of course
>>> only if this person has an user in the datatracker.
>>>
>>>      One option is edit one of this field (but this is so ugly).
>>>
>>>      I think that the best option is allow to the 'take care' a if the
>>> current user is allowed to edit the liaison (This check is done on the
>>> fly and checks if the user is currently an sdo manager of the liaison).
>>
>>
>> There's an entry in the LiaisonDetails class which is 'person'.
>> This would be the person who holds the token to handle a liaison,
>> maybe?  If so, I think that's the entry Patrik would like to update.
>>
>> But if this entry isn't used anywhere, then we need to figure out
>> the distinction between the set of people who 'can take care of' a
>> liaison, and the person who has the token.
>>
>>
>> Best,
>>
>>     Henrik
>>
>
>