Re: [yaco-liaison-tool] The liaison tool: Status Update

"Emilio A. Sánchez" <esanchez@yaco.es> Thu, 07 April 2011 09:35 UTC

Return-Path: <esanchez@yaco.es>
X-Original-To: yaco-liaison-tool@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: yaco-liaison-tool@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1EB0F3A69E7 for <yaco-liaison-tool@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 7 Apr 2011 02:35:27 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.953
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.953 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.136, BAYES_00=-2.599, DNS_FROM_RFC_BOGUSMX=1.482, MIME_8BIT_HEADER=0.3, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 6TYUDpYwvNoG for <yaco-liaison-tool@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 7 Apr 2011 02:35:26 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-fx0-f44.google.com (mail-fx0-f44.google.com [209.85.161.44]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EFABD3A697F for <yaco-liaison-tool@ietf.org>; Thu, 7 Apr 2011 02:35:25 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by fxm15 with SMTP id 15so1757560fxm.31 for <yaco-liaison-tool@ietf.org>; Thu, 07 Apr 2011 02:37:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.223.127.210 with SMTP id h18mr631364fas.73.1302169029830; Thu, 07 Apr 2011 02:37:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.0.197] ([77.227.215.107]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id b18sm422656fak.8.2011.04.07.02.37.07 (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Thu, 07 Apr 2011 02:37:09 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <4D9D85CF.1030100@yaco.es>
Date: Thu, 07 Apr 2011 11:37:19 +0200
From: "\"Emilio A. Sánchez\"" <esanchez@yaco.es>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.9.2.14) Gecko/20110223 Thunderbird/3.1.8
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Henrik Levkowetz <henrik@levkowetz.com>
References: <4D483171.7090508@levkowetz.com> <A9723AE7-F5B8-4722-BBB6-80F71C6AED31@amsl.com> <4D485061.3090204@levkowetz.com> <1FD00AF1-C1C6-4D33-9E70-E2B3D3ED11A6@cisco.com> <4D494292.1000809@levkowetz.com> <D4C88766-1C27-4212-B833-EF9F3B06452C@cisco.com> <4D49D50A.9000408@levkowetz.com> <18D7B1E6-2A70-4C5A-8C0E-9D43AD489599@cisco.com> <4D4B0946.7070302@levkowetz.com> <AF68B07C-FB34-4B7D-B710-848C710E20E1@cisco.com> <4D4BB18F.8020808@yaco.es> <09D40B0B-3058-4416-AC88-49C072EE93E0@cisco.com> <1EA3B690-E6A3-4988-8D2A-8A73147117EA@amsl.com> <C09F0708-AD85-4B96-BB63-537DE1936373@cisco.com> <4D9C5C79.40904@levkowetz.com> <4D9C72BB.8020605@yaco.es> <4D9D74E6.3080808@levkowetz.com> <4D9D7BBC.4030708@yaco.es> <4D9D80D5.50302@levkowetz.com>
In-Reply-To: <4D9D80D5.50302@levkowetz.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Cc: yaco-liaison-tool@ietf.org, Eliot Lear <lear@cisco.com>, Patrik Fältström <pfaltstr@cisco.com>, Ray Pelletier <rpelletier@isoc.org>
Subject: Re: [yaco-liaison-tool] The liaison tool: Status Update
X-BeenThere: yaco-liaison-tool@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion of the Yaco / Liaison Statement Management Tool Project details <yaco-liaison-tool.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/yaco-liaison-tool>, <mailto:yaco-liaison-tool-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/yaco-liaison-tool>
List-Post: <mailto:yaco-liaison-tool@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:yaco-liaison-tool-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/yaco-liaison-tool>, <mailto:yaco-liaison-tool-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 07 Apr 2011 09:35:27 -0000

    Hi,

    Right now the field person of the LiaisonDetail model stores the 
PersonOrOrgInfo of the user that creates the liaison. The real one so if 
the secretariat is sending a liaisons the person field has the 
secretariat user person.

    But this info is not used to grant any privilege over the liaisons.

    Best,

El 07/04/11 11:16, Henrik Levkowetz escribió:
> Hi Emilio,
>
> I'm not sure you, Patrik and myself are talking about the same thing
> here.  See more below.
>
> On 2011-04-07 10:54 "Emilio A. Sánchez" said:
>>      Hi.
>>
>> El 07/04/11 10:25, Henrik Levkowetz escribió:
>>> Hi Emilio,
>>>
>>> On 2011-04-06 16:03 "Emilio A. Sánchez" said:
>>> ...
>>>
>>>>       I don't understand what data want's to edit Patrik when he say 'who
>>>> holds the action item'. If he refers to the person who can 'take care'
>>>> of a liaison, this person is selected automatically.
>>>
>>> But if the SDO Liaison Manager is changing, then liaisons which still
>>> need to be taken care of will need to be updated, no?
>>
>>      I'm revising the code. The persons who are allowed to 'take care' of
>> a liaison are:
>>
>>      * The secretariat (always)
>>      * Any person whose email is listed under 'cc', 'reply_to', 'poc',
>> 'response_contact', 'technical_contact' and the submitter. Of course
>> only if this person has an user in the datatracker.
>>
>>      One option is edit one of this field (but this is so ugly).
>>
>>      I think that the best option is allow to the 'take care' a if the
>> current user is allowed to edit the liaison (This check is done on the
>> fly and checks if the user is currently an sdo manager of the liaison).
>
>
> There's an entry in the LiaisonDetails class which is 'person'.
> This would be the person who holds the token to handle a liaison,
> maybe?  If so, I think that's the entry Patrik would like to update.
>
> But if this entry isn't used anywhere, then we need to figure out
> the distinction between the set of people who 'can take care of' a
> liaison, and the person who has the token.
>
>
> Best,
>
> 	Henrik
>