[yaco-nomcom-tool] Last doubts about the models

Emilio Jimenez <ejimenez@yaco.es> Mon, 03 December 2012 11:20 UTC

Return-Path: <ejimenez@yaco.es>
X-Original-To: yaco-nomcom-tool@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: yaco-nomcom-tool@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6309E21F86F3 for <yaco-nomcom-tool@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 3 Dec 2012 03:20:48 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.376
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.376 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_50=0.001, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ewvo6RtSYbxi for <yaco-nomcom-tool@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 3 Dec 2012 03:20:47 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-ee0-f44.google.com (mail-ee0-f44.google.com [74.125.83.44]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DAE6D21F86A4 for <yaco-nomcom-tool@ietf.org>; Mon, 3 Dec 2012 03:20:40 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-ee0-f44.google.com with SMTP id b47so1681306eek.31 for <yaco-nomcom-tool@ietf.org>; Mon, 03 Dec 2012 03:20:39 -0800 (PST)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type :x-gm-message-state; bh=7k/6+7jBGXGld5n5DRKU8bjNVUuBrckg9rFlw3Yl5zA=; b=NzJw8Ieh62ro9jGaIi3MIWQmNS6hy3sezYXp6v62d1b4peGKSM5OFJiqn8Gqcq6ZNj uIa63zv9azXS4+iaY57HGgyU4SBtmSYbwoOhvPl1zoB+Ql0gQHUkK7zH4pvYKZ7ysllz rIIBD78pHYHmIbfVhBdbGHJbOh6T3pVEGeLzNsf5JKZOCaVE0o25Mx46rNTp3NLqnawa jgIFxaeNB9IQiB3jWSFiN8SVjvTG6IO3n03yHFsYHMAlsk1AUdDXpRxoP5M7vlRSpC/i XO5KH1Um1XcCjSne/x8q2waXEVVz6hW4vMgPaAQguvuHDAOBFEC+MnSp0APOfpiuVgS6 4EKg==
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.14.203.2 with SMTP id e2mr35191036eeo.20.1354533639176; Mon, 03 Dec 2012 03:20:39 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.223.4.215 with HTTP; Mon, 3 Dec 2012 03:20:39 -0800 (PST)
Date: Mon, 3 Dec 2012 12:20:39 +0100
Message-ID: <CAFPxG+JwM9M1d50WfM384G6kYMHHsxQbi5cYUQcR7SYQ9o2T8A@mail.gmail.com>
From: Emilio Jimenez <ejimenez@yaco.es>
To: nomcom <yaco-nomcom-tool@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=047d7b33db1266434904cff0f05f
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQmTBOGCfrWrjcB1Uc7yItZIlbKWpEgKKiP7Qlzfc+5Rg6661ySaLuV0LU1R7uWniskIbNUY
Subject: [yaco-nomcom-tool] Last doubts about the models
X-BeenThere: yaco-nomcom-tool@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion of the Yaco / Nomcom Project <yaco-nomcom-tool.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/yaco-nomcom-tool>, <mailto:yaco-nomcom-tool-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/yaco-nomcom-tool>
List-Post: <mailto:yaco-nomcom-tool@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:yaco-nomcom-tool-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/yaco-nomcom-tool>, <mailto:yaco-nomcom-tool-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 03 Dec 2012 11:20:48 -0000

Hi Henrik, we have a last doubt, should the nomcom model have a acronym and
name field or we must use the acronym and name of related group?

nomcom.acronym or nomcom.group.acronym, nomcom.name or nomcom.group.name?

Best regards.

-- 

Emilio J. Jiménez del Moral
Yaco Sistemas S.L. | http://www.yaco.es
C/ Rioja 5, 41001 Sevilla (España)
Teléfono: (+34) 954 50 00 57 | Fax (+34) 954 50 09 29