Re: [yaco-nomcom-tool] Last doubts about the models

Henrik Levkowetz <henrik@levkowetz.com> Thu, 13 December 2012 14:28 UTC

Return-Path: <henrik@levkowetz.com>
X-Original-To: yaco-nomcom-tool@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: yaco-nomcom-tool@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8D7C521F8509 for <yaco-nomcom-tool@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 13 Dec 2012 06:28:25 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.6
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.6 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.000, BAYES_00=-2.599, NO_RELAYS=-0.001, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 8RiLHknb53mR for <yaco-nomcom-tool@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 13 Dec 2012 06:28:24 -0800 (PST)
Received: from merlot.tools.ietf.org (merlot.tools.ietf.org [IPv6:2a01:3f0:0:31::14]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B626F21F8430 for <yaco-nomcom-tool@ietf.org>; Thu, 13 Dec 2012 06:28:22 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [2a01:3f0:1:0:d086:6fbd:39d5:fcf0] (port=52920 helo=brunello.netnod.se) by merlot.tools.ietf.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from <henrik@levkowetz.com>) id 1Tj9lX-0006WF-Bz; Thu, 13 Dec 2012 15:28:00 +0100
Message-ID: <50C9E5EE.9010306@levkowetz.com>
Date: Thu, 13 Dec 2012 15:27:58 +0100
From: Henrik Levkowetz <henrik@levkowetz.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.7; rv:10.0.11) Gecko/20121115 Thunderbird/10.0.11
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Emilio Jimenez <ejimenez@yaco.es>
References: <CAFPxG+JwM9M1d50WfM384G6kYMHHsxQbi5cYUQcR7SYQ9o2T8A@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAFPxG+JwM9M1d50WfM384G6kYMHHsxQbi5cYUQcR7SYQ9o2T8A@mail.gmail.com>
X-Enigmail-Version: 1.4
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 2a01:3f0:1:0:d086:6fbd:39d5:fcf0
X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: ejimenez@yaco.es, yaco-nomcom-tool@ietf.org, henrik-sent@levkowetz.com
X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: henrik@levkowetz.com
X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2.1 (built Mon, 26 Dec 2011 16:57:07 +0000)
X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on merlot.tools.ietf.org)
Cc: nomcom <yaco-nomcom-tool@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [yaco-nomcom-tool] Last doubts about the models
X-BeenThere: yaco-nomcom-tool@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion of the Yaco / Nomcom Project <yaco-nomcom-tool.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/yaco-nomcom-tool>, <mailto:yaco-nomcom-tool-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/yaco-nomcom-tool>
List-Post: <mailto:yaco-nomcom-tool@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:yaco-nomcom-tool-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/yaco-nomcom-tool>, <mailto:yaco-nomcom-tool-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 13 Dec 2012 14:28:25 -0000

Hi Emilio,

On 2012-12-03 12:20 Emilio Jimenez said:
> Hi Henrik, we have a last doubt, should the nomcom model have a acronym and
> name field or we must use the acronym and name of related group?

The latter (those of the related group) would be best, I think.


Best regards,

	Henrik


> nomcom.acronym or nomcom.group.acronym, nomcom.name or nomcom.group.name?
> 
> Best regards.
> 
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> yaco-nomcom-tool mailing list
> yaco-nomcom-tool@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/yaco-nomcom-tool