[yaco-nomcom-tool] Nomcom Public key

Emilio Jimenez <ejimenez@yaco.es> Thu, 27 December 2012 14:08 UTC

Return-Path: <ejimenez@yaco.es>
X-Original-To: yaco-nomcom-tool@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: yaco-nomcom-tool@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CC49B21F8628 for <yaco-nomcom-tool@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 27 Dec 2012 06:08:34 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.326
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.326 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.650, BAYES_00=-2.599, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id qI4HLf8XULsM for <yaco-nomcom-tool@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 27 Dec 2012 06:08:34 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-vc0-f172.google.com (mail-vc0-f172.google.com [209.85.220.172]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2166621F853E for <yaco-nomcom-tool@ietf.org>; Thu, 27 Dec 2012 06:08:33 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-vc0-f172.google.com with SMTP id fw7so9819734vcb.17 for <yaco-nomcom-tool@ietf.org>; Thu, 27 Dec 2012 06:08:33 -0800 (PST)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type :x-gm-message-state; bh=lpcMCiLi3UvDsutVpU+U0o1xhFrzEmuqiD0hJk4Nl/s=; b=b9h8+bGWgudXRYi/Ayi9SSEMMo6my9SnSgBpf22Av7TRYrM/78SgGl8+7w0U1gP6uH tk4Y7xQttJ9aML+HjVut6SLdU03JBvM2Xb9UdJUp/eIPasyohzID2eANy0xtmBc8uvlD eYn2/btgBLAnbR9x9fKlwgPfL3pGJmvEg4I7wslqQBXD2jVb9lwqWr5+eM8sX/NmbWMM tRJKZH53hk486wcgCs5nRXLXNdSNtZrdCCkK8ptBcodGymKfORIJFPA9qp1loXkCE0os tm7w1eFYLXMF8zyhHZiLKgutkS+bv8Gimb3WD25j9KaMG4UozETJq5+/3JfCIl4UwgkR 6TWg==
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.58.48.231 with SMTP id p7mr48429842ven.11.1356617313283; Thu, 27 Dec 2012 06:08:33 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.58.144.201 with HTTP; Thu, 27 Dec 2012 06:08:32 -0800 (PST)
Date: Thu, 27 Dec 2012 15:08:32 +0100
Message-ID: <CAFPxG+K74HB2Rw7c4UBk-B3N1jkDVO1s0FiA31PnP7sNMU0Jhg@mail.gmail.com>
From: Emilio Jimenez <ejimenez@yaco.es>
To: Henrik Levkowetz <henrik@levkowetz.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=089e01182b260dec7f04d1d615fc
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQnbl2918Z0dGiaYDU39ZGE29CihbdFNFQsyugRtnd4J4FB1R2W+EDvMC77BXdRDE8Q2TrI7
Cc: nomcom <yaco-nomcom-tool@ietf.org>
Subject: [yaco-nomcom-tool] Nomcom Public key
X-BeenThere: yaco-nomcom-tool@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion of the Yaco / Nomcom Project <yaco-nomcom-tool.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/yaco-nomcom-tool>, <mailto:yaco-nomcom-tool-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/yaco-nomcom-tool>
List-Post: <mailto:yaco-nomcom-tool@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:yaco-nomcom-tool-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/yaco-nomcom-tool>, <mailto:yaco-nomcom-tool-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 27 Dec 2012 14:08:34 -0000

Hi Henrik,

i have an important question:

What if there isn't a nomcom public key when the users submit feedback?
should the public key be required when you create the nomcom? or it must be
optional and if there isn't a public key the comment will be stored
unencrypted

Best regards

-- 

Emilio J. Jiménez del Moral
Yaco Sistemas S.L. | http://www.yaco.es
C/ Rioja 5, 41001 Sevilla (España)
Teléfono: (+34) 954 50 00 57 | Fax (+34) 954 50 09 29