[yaco-nomcom-tool] Question about merging nominations

"Emilio A. Sánchez López" <esanchez@yaco.es> Tue, 15 January 2013 08:30 UTC

Return-Path: <esanchez@yaco.es>
X-Original-To: yaco-nomcom-tool@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: yaco-nomcom-tool@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 65C4F21F8B19 for <yaco-nomcom-tool@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 15 Jan 2013 00:30:32 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.299
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.299 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, MIME_8BIT_HEADER=0.3, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id AdCMYonFH3ZI for <yaco-nomcom-tool@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 15 Jan 2013 00:30:31 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-wg0-f46.google.com (mail-wg0-f46.google.com [74.125.82.46]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1DCF521F8B35 for <yaco-nomcom-tool@ietf.org>; Tue, 15 Jan 2013 00:30:30 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-wg0-f46.google.com with SMTP id dr13so2531275wgb.25 for <yaco-nomcom-tool@ietf.org>; Tue, 15 Jan 2013 00:30:30 -0800 (PST)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=x-received:message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc :subject:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:x-gm-message-state; bh=PJ7+IzwvIuMc3pL/ZPQ6JJuLdzhnuRfg55SJCMkENlo=; b=byIOxpDPqXXqZODoE+48MSZAZqA6CnU8pTMWxxOafPezM8lhQRYZ3JbmcI3SG7MbhQ XH7/n+arzsjuAAuCURGUtEotROfgvnywJKmpNZLWFwvEl4jjQjL3uagn9gDJTIEYoaJ0 H1jWd1QiyfpQZ8YBp0Ym0qno2nFiZD7XKIBk8J3DOBsamnTnCqb3vURJRVE+JUZXIy2e vdZBJ+vsclqgqt6WRl149x8/+6cL5OHR5vdPw/qb6QUyfct5EVJw4v+Fsldj693bdCH5 zccUqQKvis5kU3UDq95cr+uduQLljggXB1v0hSvKUjBTOVex+749P/rhH1Yk8MxgL9GQ hylA==
X-Received: by 10.194.20.231 with SMTP id q7mr139640871wje.44.1358238630083; Tue, 15 Jan 2013 00:30:30 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [192.168.0.8] ([46.25.205.167]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id s10sm2661962wiw.4.2013.01.15.00.30.28 (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Tue, 15 Jan 2013 00:30:29 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <50F513A3.9090709@yaco.es>
Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2013 09:30:27 +0100
From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?=22Emilio_A=2E_S=E1nchez_L=F3pez=22?= <esanchez@yaco.es>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130106 Thunderbird/17.0.2
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Henrik Levkowetz <henrik@levkowetz.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQlPjFrZDDl3HtKMISzOoOb3xH3cPBXKb/A6+IHQuKazXeYrXEVqrhdptl20U2tg4sGx1kNW
Cc: yaco-nomcom-tool@ietf.org
Subject: [yaco-nomcom-tool] Question about merging nominations
X-BeenThere: yaco-nomcom-tool@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion of the Yaco / Nomcom Project <yaco-nomcom-tool.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/yaco-nomcom-tool>, <mailto:yaco-nomcom-tool-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/yaco-nomcom-tool>
List-Post: <mailto:yaco-nomcom-tool@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:yaco-nomcom-tool-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/yaco-nomcom-tool>, <mailto:yaco-nomcom-tool-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2013 08:30:32 -0000

    Hi Henrik,

    We have a doubt about merging nominations.

    If some person has been nominated to the same position using 
different emails the tool provide the chair with an interface to merge 
this nominations into one.

    The question is what to do when the nominations we have to merge 
have different status? If the nominee has accepted one of them and the 
other one is pending there is no problem we can assert that the 
nomination is accepted. But what if the nominee has accepted one and 
rejected the other?

    Maybe we should keep the status of the first nomination. So if the 
chair choose to merge Nomination2 into Nomination1 then we keep the 
status of Nomination1 and ignore the status of Nomination2.

    The other questions is about questionnaires. What if the nominee has 
sent two different questionnaires using two different emails? I know 
that this case is a bit extreme, probably a nominee will never fill two 
times the same questionnaire, instead he will blame the chair about 
using only one email. But if we found this case, we should drop some 
questionnaire or we should keep two of them?

    Best,

-- 
Emilio A. Sánchez
esanchez@yaco.es