Re: [yaco-wgchair-tracker] Need some clarification about IESG email

Paul Hoffman <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org> Tue, 20 September 2011 16:21 UTC

Return-Path: <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org>
X-Original-To: yaco-wgchair-tracker@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: yaco-wgchair-tracker@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 27EB921F8801 for <yaco-wgchair-tracker@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 20 Sep 2011 09:21:57 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.548
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.548 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.051, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id C0RXVp64sgT2 for <yaco-wgchair-tracker@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 20 Sep 2011 09:21:56 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from hoffman.proper.com (IPv6.Hoffman.Proper.COM [IPv6:2605:8e00:100:41::81]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 810D921F86EE for <yaco-wgchair-tracker@ietf.org>; Tue, 20 Sep 2011 09:21:56 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [10.20.30.100] (50-0-66-4.dsl.dynamic.fusionbroadband.com [50.0.66.4]) (authenticated bits=0) by hoffman.proper.com (8.14.4/8.14.3) with ESMTP id p8KGOLR3046269 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Tue, 20 Sep 2011 09:24:22 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from paul.hoffman@vpnc.org)
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1244.3)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
From: Paul Hoffman <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org>
In-Reply-To: <4E775662.1020809@levkowetz.com>
Date: Tue, 20 Sep 2011 09:24:21 -0700
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <1D96D6D3-9B60-45F8-AA4C-E0C6A0E5836B@vpnc.org>
References: <4E63F595.7080806@yaco.es> <4E775662.1020809@levkowetz.com>
To: "Emilio A. Sanchez Lopez" <esanchez@yaco.es>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1244.3)
Cc: yaco-wgchair-tracker@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [yaco-wgchair-tracker] Need some clarification about IESG email
X-BeenThere: yaco-wgchair-tracker@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion of the Yaco / WG Chairs' and Authors' Tracker Project <yaco-wgchair-tracker.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/yaco-wgchair-tracker>, <mailto:yaco-wgchair-tracker-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/yaco-wgchair-tracker>
List-Post: <mailto:yaco-wgchair-tracker@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:yaco-wgchair-tracker-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/yaco-wgchair-tracker>, <mailto:yaco-wgchair-tracker-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 20 Sep 2011 16:21:57 -0000

> -------- Original Message --------
> Subject: [yaco-wgchair-tracker] Need some clarification about IESG email
> Date: Mon, 05 Sep 2011 00:03:01 +0200
> From: "Emilio A. Sánchez" <esanchez@yaco.es>;
> To: yaco-wgchair-tracker@ietf.org
> 
>    Hi everyone,
> 
>    We need some clarification about the email text change requested in 
> http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc6322#section-7
> 
>    What's wrong with the current email?

The subject line does not reflect the actual contents of the message, and the message doesn't say why the message is being sent.

> How should we rewrite the new 
> email?


1.      Change the subject from "Informational RFC to be: <draft-foo>" to "Results of IETF-conflict review for <draft-foo>". 

2.      Add a citation of RFC5742 to the boilerplate.  Something like "The IESG has completed a review of <draft-foo> consistent with RFC5742.  This review is applied to all non-IETF streams."  

--Paul Hoffman