Re: [yaco-wgchair-tracker] Bug report: Wrong date in History

Magnus Westerlund <> Tue, 06 March 2012 10:23 UTC

Return-Path: <>
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6F9B921F885F for <>; Tue, 6 Mar 2012 02:23:26 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -110.183
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-110.183 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.116, BAYES_00=-2.599, MIME_8BIT_HEADER=0.3, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from ([]) by localhost ( []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id M0+xhMWbZZ+F for <>; Tue, 6 Mar 2012 02:23:25 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ( []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3167921F871E for <>; Tue, 6 Mar 2012 02:23:25 -0800 (PST)
X-AuditID: c1b4fb3d-b7bb7ae0000007b2-38-4f55e59b5aa4
Received: from (Unknown_Domain []) by (Symantec Mail Security) with SMTP id F0.84.01970.B95E55F4; Tue, 6 Mar 2012 11:23:24 +0100 (CET)
Received: from [] ( by ( with Microsoft SMTP Server id; Tue, 6 Mar 2012 11:23:23 +0100
Message-ID: <>
Date: Tue, 6 Mar 2012 11:23:23 +0100
From: Magnus Westerlund <>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; rv:10.0.2) Gecko/20120216 Thunderbird/10.0.2
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?=22Emilio_A=2E_S=E1nchez=22?= <>
References: <> <>
In-Reply-To: <>
X-Enigmail-Version: 1.3.5
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Brightmail-Tracker: AAAAAA==
Cc: "" <>
Subject: Re: [yaco-wgchair-tracker] Bug report: Wrong date in History
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion of the Yaco / WG Chairs' and Authors' Tracker Project <>
List-Unsubscribe: <>, <>
List-Archive: <>
List-Post: <>
List-Help: <>
List-Subscribe: <>, <>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 06 Mar 2012 10:23:26 -0000

On 2012-03-05 17:09, "Emilio A. Sánchez" wrote:
>     Hi Magnus,
> El 05/03/12 16:24, Magnus Westerlund escribió:
>> Hi,
>> I changed the state of the  following doc:
>> to be "In WG last call" state. If you look at the date is says
>> 2012-03-02 for the comment I entered, while the state change has the
>> correct date of 2012-03-05.
>     That's weird, the two comment should have the same date. I'm going 
> to inspect what's going on.


>> Is the "Labeling" for change doc state changed to "Change stream state"?
>> I think using "stream" here is a very poor choice. The only stream state
>> I know of is the one related to if the document is a IETF, IRTF, IAB or
>> RFC-independent submission. As this is the button for chaning the
>> Document state, I think the link should be "Change Document State".
>     I understand your point of view. The link you are talking about was 
> originally 'Change state' but it was renamed a few months ago. I guess 
> it was done for clarity cause you chage the state inside an stream.

Hmm, is that really a stream or in a particular role, i.e WG chair etc.

>> In addition I would like to complain about the lack of feedback on any
>> of the feedback I as a user provide to this list. I get no indication
>> that anything is read, no follow up questions or indication that
>> anything will or will not happen. I doesn't make me inclined to provide
>> more feedback.
>     I'm sorry to hear that. I don't rembember seeing any mail in this 
> list in recent months. If I missed some of your mails, please can you 
> forward them to me?

The latest was forwarded by Henrik on the 20th of Feb. Then I have one
email from 2011-06-10 on which I didn't receive any response on. If you
still want me to forward send a private email.

I brought this up to try to get an improvement. I can see one issue
being when their are questions on what functionality should be provided
and how it is labeled, which I expect the contracting party to answer
rather than you as developer.


Magnus Westerlund

Multimedia Technologies, Ericsson Research EAB/TVM
Ericsson AB                | Phone  +46 10 7148287
Färögatan 6                | Mobile +46 73 0949079
SE-164 80 Stockholm, Sweden| mailto: