IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [yam] Status: draft-ietf-yam-rfc1652bis-03

S Moonesamy <sm+ietf@elandsys.com> Thu, 11 March 2010 23:23 UTC

Return-Path: <sm@elandsys.com>
X-Original-To: yam@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: yam@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F18673A6812 for <yam@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 11 Mar 2010 15:23:24 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.225
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.225 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.374, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id SIBGsiRV7NL5 for <yam@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 11 Mar 2010 15:23:23 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail.elandsys.com (mail.elandsys.com [208.69.177.125]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 809073A6957 for <yam@ietf.org>; Thu, 11 Mar 2010 15:22:53 -0800 (PST)
Received: from SUBMAN.elandsys.com ([41.136.237.199]) (authenticated bits=0) by mail.elandsys.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o2BNMpgk010839 for <yam@ietf.org>; Thu, 11 Mar 2010 15:22:57 -0800
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/simple; d=elandsys.com; s=mail; t=1268349779; x=1268436179; bh=9bpmmjm/xHAgpmWkE07SmIFsWe8=; h=Message-Id:Date:To:From:Subject:In-Reply-To:References: Mime-Version:Content-Type; b=z/xnrFPcm52Hn1vL29E5HCb1tsjAxgbLy5TkmpN6cmo0puta2oDw3SRRbKsf1uQsO V5YvSAep0SMCTOmuQCK+FwfQYh8lrc/tdW2td1kbPaAhtUjUcpquuI3pW7w2EWZkc5 9bhYcS/+OC5CzRk4lCTuZE3cY+2yUla5jISVujHU=
Message-Id: <6.2.5.6.2.20100311152007.0c74e290@elandnews.com>
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 6.2.5.6
Date: Thu, 11 Mar 2010 15:22:39 -0800
To: yam@ietf.org
From: S Moonesamy <sm+ietf@elandsys.com>
In-Reply-To: <4B997568.7090703@isode.com>
References: <6.2.5.6.2.20100309122913.05f7ae18@elandnews.com> <4B99676A.9060400@isode.com> <6.2.5.6.2.20100311141313.0c745b90@resistor.net> <4B997568.7090703@isode.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed"
Subject: Re: [yam] Status: draft-ietf-yam-rfc1652bis-03
X-BeenThere: yam@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Yet Another Mail working group discussion list <yam.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/yam>, <mailto:yam-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/yam>
List-Post: <mailto:yam@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:yam-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/yam>, <mailto:yam-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 11 Mar 2010 23:23:25 -0000

At 14:57 11-03-10, Alexey Melnikov wrote:
>You are confused. This is the status of the pre-evaluation document.

I most certainly am confused. :-)

Thanks for getting RFC 1652bis through the process.

Regards,
S. Moonesamy

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email