Re: [yam] getting ready for WG Last Call on draft-ietf-yam-rfc1652bis-pre-evaluation-00.txt

We're in the middle of August.  This (and December) are the worst possible times 
for a Last Call.

I suggest 2 weeks normally, but 3 weeks this time.

d/

Tony Hansen wrote:
> I promised that we'd have a WG Last Call on the evaluation template for 
> RFC 1652bis after it was posted. Given the number of preliminary 
> versions we've gone through and the comments and turnaround on those, 
> we've actually got a lot of water under the bridge already for this draft.
> 
> How long do we want to have these WGLCs run? Is one week sufficient? I 
> certainly don't want to go longer than two weeks.
> 
> I'm going to start the WGLC on Thursday. Please comment on the length to 
> run it.
> 
> And please do review draft-ietf-yam-rfc1652bis-pre-evaluation.
> 
>     Tony Hansen
>     YAM co-chair
> 
> Internet-Drafts@ietf.org wrote:
>> A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts 
>> directories.
>> This draft is a work item of the Yet Another Mail Working Group of the 
>> IETF.
>>
>>
>>     Title           : Preliminary Evaluation of RFC 1652 for 
>> Advancement to Full Standard
>>     Author(s)       : D. Crocker
>>     Filename        : draft-ietf-yam-rfc1652bis-pre-evaluation-00.txt
>>     Pages           : 5
>>     Date            : 2009-08-17
>>
>> This memo is a preliminary evaluation of RFC 1652 "SMTP Service
>> Extension for 8bit-MIMEtransport" for advancement from Draft to Full
>> Standard.  It has been prepared by the The Yet Another Mail Working
>> Group.
> 
> _______________________________________________
> yam mailing list
> yam@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/yam
> 

-- 

   Dave Crocker
   Brandenburg InternetWorking
   bbiw.net