Re: [yam] scheduling conflicts for upcoming YAM meeting
Alexey Melnikov <alexey.melnikov@isode.com> Mon, 31 August 2009 18:41 UTC
Return-Path: <alexey.melnikov@isode.com>
X-Original-To: yam@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: yam@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EB8CE28C2A9 for <yam@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 31 Aug 2009 11:41:06 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.547
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.547 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.052, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id UQmFFO0aCiRC for <yam@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 31 Aug 2009 11:41:06 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rufus.isode.com (rufus.isode.com [62.3.217.251]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 16C0C3A6BB7 for <yam@ietf.org>; Mon, 31 Aug 2009 11:41:06 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [172.16.2.137] (shiny.isode.com [62.3.217.250]) by rufus.isode.com (submission channel) via TCP with ESMTPA id <SpwZSwB9YTSY@rufus.isode.com>; Mon, 31 Aug 2009 19:41:16 +0100
Message-ID: <4A9C1922.9060807@isode.com>
Date: Mon, 31 Aug 2009 19:40:34 +0100
From: Alexey Melnikov <alexey.melnikov@isode.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.7.12) Gecko/20050915
X-Accept-Language: en-us, en
To: Tony Hansen <tony@att.com>
References: <4A9BE125.40906@att.com>
In-Reply-To: <4A9BE125.40906@att.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: Yet Another Mail Working Group <yam@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [yam] scheduling conflicts for upcoming YAM meeting
X-BeenThere: yam@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Yet Another Mail working group discussion list <yam.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/yam>, <mailto:yam-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/yam>
List-Post: <mailto:yam@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:yam-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/yam>, <mailto:yam-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 31 Aug 2009 18:41:07 -0000
Tony Hansen wrote: > It's time to schedule the YAM meeting for Hiroshima. I'd rather get > this done early rather than late in the cycle like last time. What > conflicts does everyone want us to avoid? > > My initial list is: > > APP apparea > APP httpbis > APP idnabis > APP morg > APP ogpx > APP sieve > APP vcarddav > SEC sasl > SEC dkim + eai and xmpp as pointed out by Dave/John. And this looks fine to me. > Any other conflicts we should avoid?
- [yam] scheduling conflicts for upcoming YAM meeti… Tony Hansen
- Re: [yam] scheduling conflicts for upcoming YAM m… John C Klensin
- Re: [yam] scheduling conflicts for upcoming YAM m… Dave CROCKER
- Re: [yam] scheduling conflicts for upcoming YAM m… Alexey Melnikov
- [yam] scheduling conflicts for upcoming YAM meeti… Tony Hansen
- Re: [yam] scheduling conflicts for upcoming YAM m… Barry Leiba