IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [yam] Status: draft-ietf-yam-rfc1652bis-03

Alexey Melnikov <alexey.melnikov@isode.com> Thu, 11 March 2010 22:58 UTC

Return-Path: <alexey.melnikov@isode.com>
X-Original-To: yam@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: yam@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 04E183A6894 for <yam@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 11 Mar 2010 14:58:03 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.59
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.59 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.009, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id OIrhCFQqt0km for <yam@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 11 Mar 2010 14:58:02 -0800 (PST)
Received: from rufus.isode.com (rufus.isode.com [62.3.217.251]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 021513A67F8 for <yam@ietf.org>; Thu, 11 Mar 2010 14:58:02 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [172.16.2.187] (shiny.isode.com [62.3.217.250]) by rufus.isode.com (submission channel) via TCP with ESMTPA id <S5l1fgAu7gqo@rufus.isode.com>; Thu, 11 Mar 2010 22:58:06 +0000
Message-ID: <4B997568.7090703@isode.com>
Date: Thu, 11 Mar 2010 22:57:44 +0000
From: Alexey Melnikov <alexey.melnikov@isode.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.7.12) Gecko/20050915
X-Accept-Language: en-us, en
To: S Moonesamy <sm+ietf@elandsys.com>
References: <6.2.5.6.2.20100309122913.05f7ae18@elandnews.com> <4B99676A.9060400@isode.com> <6.2.5.6.2.20100311141313.0c745b90@resistor.net>
In-Reply-To: <6.2.5.6.2.20100311141313.0c745b90@resistor.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: yam@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [yam] Status: draft-ietf-yam-rfc1652bis-03
X-BeenThere: yam@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Yet Another Mail working group discussion list <yam.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/yam>, <mailto:yam-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/yam>
List-Post: <mailto:yam@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:yam-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/yam>, <mailto:yam-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 11 Mar 2010 22:58:03 -0000

S Moonesamy wrote:

> At 13:58 11-03-10, Alexey Melnikov wrote:
>
>> The document was approved by IESG today. My scars are beginning to 
>> heal...
>
> The status for draft-ietf-yam-rfc1652bis-03 is "Do not publish".  This 
> is not an issue as the document has been approved by the IESG.

You are confused. This is the status of the pre-evaluation document.

> As an individual comment, I'll say that I am relieved that the 
> Hiroshima option was not exercised.  It is left to the appreciation of 
> the reader to see whether it is a reference to the last meeting. :-)

Me too.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email