Re: [yam] IESG evaluation of draft-ietf-yam-5321bis-smtp-pre-evaluation-05

Tony Hansen <tony@att.com> Sat, 22 May 2010 02:27 UTC

Return-Path: <tony@att.com>
X-Original-To: yam@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: yam@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9BD953A6AB5 for <yam@core3.amsl.com>; Fri, 21 May 2010 19:27:09 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -104.884
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-104.884 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.699, BAYES_40=-0.185, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 4btsOJztU+zv for <yam@core3.amsl.com>; Fri, 21 May 2010 19:27:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail167.messagelabs.com (mail167.messagelabs.com [216.82.253.179]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A393D3A695A for <yam@ietf.org>; Fri, 21 May 2010 19:27:05 -0700 (PDT)
X-VirusChecked: Checked
X-Env-Sender: tony@att.com
X-Msg-Ref: server-6.tower-167.messagelabs.com!1274495217!15502752!1
X-StarScan-Version: 6.2.4; banners=-,-,-
X-Originating-IP: [144.160.20.146]
Received: (qmail 19182 invoked from network); 22 May 2010 02:26:58 -0000
Received: from sbcsmtp7.sbc.com (HELO mlpd194.enaf.sfdc.sbc.com) (144.160.20.146) by server-6.tower-167.messagelabs.com with DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA encrypted SMTP; 22 May 2010 02:26:58 -0000
Received: from enaf.sfdc.sbc.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by mlpd194.enaf.sfdc.sbc.com (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id o4M2QdSF009137 for <yam@ietf.org>; Fri, 21 May 2010 22:26:39 -0400
Received: from klpd017.kcdc.att.com (klpd017.kcdc.att.com [135.188.40.86]) by mlpd194.enaf.sfdc.sbc.com (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id o4M2QY1m009117 for <yam@ietf.org>; Fri, 21 May 2010 22:26:34 -0400
Received: from kcdc.att.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by klpd017.kcdc.att.com (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id o4M2QqYF018140 for <yam@ietf.org>; Fri, 21 May 2010 21:26:52 -0500
Received: from maillennium.att.com (mailgw1.maillennium.att.com [135.25.114.99]) by klpd017.kcdc.att.com (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id o4M2Qjtp018078 for <yam@ietf.org>; Fri, 21 May 2010 21:26:45 -0500
Received: from [135.70.194.114] (vpn-135-70-194-114.vpn.east.att.com[135.70.194.114]) by maillennium.att.com (mailgw1) with ESMTP id <20100522022639gw100b8ivfe> (Authid: tony); Sat, 22 May 2010 02:26:45 +0000
X-Originating-IP: [135.70.194.114]
Message-ID: <4BF740DF.4070702@att.com>
Date: Fri, 21 May 2010 22:26:39 -0400
From: Tony Hansen <tony@att.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.0; en-US; rv:1.9.1.7) Gecko/20100111 Thunderbird/3.0.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Alexey Melnikov <alexey.melnikov@isode.com>
References: <6.2.5.6.2.20100504231601.09259c10@elandnews.com> <4BE4474A.5020208@isode.com> <4BF6D0FD.6020307@isode.com>
In-Reply-To: <4BF6D0FD.6020307@isode.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: yam@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [yam] IESG evaluation of draft-ietf-yam-5321bis-smtp-pre-evaluation-05
X-BeenThere: yam@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Yet Another Mail working group discussion list <yam.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/yam>, <mailto:yam-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/yam>
List-Post: <mailto:yam@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:yam-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/yam>, <mailto:yam-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 22 May 2010 02:27:09 -0000

Thank you Alexey. John, it's over to you now.

     Tony

On 5/21/2010 2:29 PM, Alexey Melnikov wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Alexey Melnikov wrote:
>
>> S Moonesamy wrote:
>>
>>> Hi Alexey,
>>>
>>> Barry submitted draft-ietf-yam-5321bis-smtp-pre-evaluation-05.  An 
>>> "Updates to References" item has been added at the end of Section 
>>> 2.4 to address the issues you raised and there were some editorial 
>>> changes (issues #18, #19, #20, #21).  Please use 
>>> draft-ietf-yam-5321bis-smtp-pre-evaluation-05 for the IESG evaluation.
>>>
>>> As a note to the YAM WG, the IESG will be discussing about this I-D 
>>> on May 6th.
>>
>> Quick status update on this:
>>
>> IESG had a very full agenda yesterday, so many ADs didn't have time 
>> to review the document. I've postponed IESG review for 2 weeks and 
>> warned ADs that they should review the document.
>
> Another quick update on this: almost all IESG members have reviewed 
> the pre-evaluation document and reported no problems with it. I am 
> still waiting for some reviews, so the official IESG response should 
> be sent out next week.
>
> Regards,
> Alexey
>
> _______________________________________________
> yam mailing list
> yam@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/yam