Re: [yam] I-D Action:draft-ietf-yam-rfc1652bis-01.txt

SM <sm@resistor.net> Mon, 25 January 2010 22:22 UTC

Return-Path: <sm@resistor.net>
X-Original-To: yam@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: yam@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A36A23A67ED for <yam@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 25 Jan 2010 14:22:23 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 6G9gbUgU5Wpf for <yam@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 25 Jan 2010 14:22:22 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ns1.qubic.net (ns1.qubic.net [208.69.177.116]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B185B3A67D7 for <yam@ietf.org>; Mon, 25 Jan 2010 14:22:22 -0800 (PST)
Received: from SUBMAN.resistor.net ([10.0.0.1]) (authenticated bits=0) by ns1.qubic.net (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id o0PMM3cc018431 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Mon, 25 Jan 2010 14:22:26 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=resistor.net; s=mail; t=1264458148; x=1264544548; bh=ksO8qVKup/2HWSs96Bch2GAqM5SMjEpcHT27KzavLSM=; h=Message-Id:Date:To:From:Subject:Cc:In-Reply-To:References: Mime-Version:Content-Type; b=Mc+/izDyjetLh97WLwRHwBwnMv+8Be0ACYdFkQpzsRcormqTYnJcK0zbpooS3HsnC 6yy2GTJ/Hso0Jlqtz0tTHlp1ihVX8VaWT4gm5mw4WrmI0d3TJPVFTfscvmRB2wcK33 TiRtImpmcisx75FfO/JjZSw1cHD07BFDUYW+u6eA=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; s=mail; d=resistor.net; c=simple; q=dns; b=n+vNxz1C8VuU/8AORok+8r+iM83081wQe8Be/KxuUxkKBzErxbm2FvlTeVQKKRh6s Ml3uaXmfLNP/FiepnaSG63/V95AOYVcZ+ir061t7/W5G7UPtxoH2YNCrTqLxM+DXN2o rplPBKpslLncliJ9zSycgBaF8KnSquL+742a52E=
Message-Id: <6.2.5.6.2.20100125134622.04ffdb10@resistor.net>
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 6.2.5.6
Date: Mon, 25 Jan 2010 14:14:24 -0800
To: Alessandro Vesely <vesely@tana.it>
From: SM <sm@resistor.net>
In-Reply-To: <4B5D6AA2.2080105@tana.it>
References: <20100120224502.6BDD13A6A2D@core3.amsl.com> <4B5D6AA2.2080105@tana.it>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed
Cc: yam@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [yam] I-D Action:draft-ietf-yam-rfc1652bis-01.txt
X-BeenThere: yam@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Yet Another Mail working group discussion list <yam.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/yam>, <mailto:yam-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/yam>
List-Post: <mailto:yam@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:yam-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/yam>, <mailto:yam-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 25 Jan 2010 22:22:24 -0000

Hi Alessandro,
At 01:55 25-01-10, Alessandro Vesely wrote:
>Should section 2 mention that the extension is valid for both SMTP 
>and Submit? I haven't got that bit quite straight, yet...

I'm not disagreeing (or agreeing) with you. :-)  I previously 
commented on the extension registration at 
http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/yam/current/msg00263.html

Regards,
-sm