IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [yam] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC6152 (5646)

John C Klensin <john-ietf@jck.com> Tue, 05 March 2019 00:16 UTC

Return-Path: <john-ietf@jck.com>
X-Original-To: yam@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: yam@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 80C7E128CB7 for <yam@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 4 Mar 2019 16:16:56 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.899
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.899 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id OSUjOH13Zn12 for <yam@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 4 Mar 2019 16:16:54 -0800 (PST)
Received: from bsa2.jck.com (bsa2.jck.com [70.88.254.51]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B5794127287 for <yam@ietf.org>; Mon, 4 Mar 2019 16:16:54 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [198.252.137.10] (helo=PSB) by bsa2.jck.com with esmtp (Exim 4.82 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from <john-ietf@jck.com>) id 1h0xl4-000M8W-6z; Mon, 04 Mar 2019 19:16:34 -0500
Date: Mon, 04 Mar 2019 19:16:29 -0500
From: John C Klensin <john-ietf@jck.com>
To: Dave Crocker <dcrocker@bbiw.net>, HE Zhixiang <af13@protonmail.com>
cc: RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>, ned.freed@mrochek.com, mrose17@gmail.com, ben@nostrum.com, aamelnikov@fastmail.fm, adam@nostrum.com, tony@att.com, sm+ietf@elandsys.com, yam@ietf.org
Message-ID: <473DB3EA2E1210FBE92A1002@PSB>
In-Reply-To: <bc8e66d0-dee7-d0a8-715a-3c453471566e@bbiw.net>
References: <-qJzCT05qGpzhVfhdNUrTlVAlRqcMpdq8G45uOVdNmiBubtWuCyopcyc5XUGR7Icv55E1Q682rVk1lNhRunxJoUe8m3FW8wN1mPnQWIqpkg=@protonmail.com> <bc8e66d0-dee7-d0a8-715a-3c453471566e@bbiw.net>
X-Mailer: Mulberry/4.0.8 (Win32)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 198.252.137.10
X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: john-ietf@jck.com
X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on bsa2.jck.com); SAEximRunCond expanded to false
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/yam/G1kK40XN_ejhKnxTCeFiC96xroE>
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Mon, 04 Mar 2019 18:01:27 -0800
Subject: Re: [yam] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC6152 (5646)
X-BeenThere: yam@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Yet Another Mail working group discussion list <yam.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/yam>, <mailto:yam-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/yam/>
List-Post: <mailto:yam@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:yam-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/yam>, <mailto:yam-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 05 Mar 2019 00:16:57 -0000


--On Monday, March 4, 2019 16:01 -0800 Dave Crocker
<dcrocker@bbiw.net> wrote:

> On 3/4/2019 3:52 PM, HE Zhixiang wrote:
>> My sincere apologies for the misinterpretation. Thanks for
>> clarifying. Please reject.
> 
> No apology needed, except perhaps from those of us who
> produced the text.
> 
> Rather this is a lesson on the need for specifications to be
> written with simple language.  Complicated sentences invite
> misunderstanding.

Which reflects badly on both us and the RFC Editor for not
pushing back.  I hope we can all learn from the experience.

   john

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email