Re: [yam] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC6152 (5646) {dkim-fail}
Ned Freed <ned.freed@mrochek.com> Mon, 04 March 2019 17:31 UTC
Return-Path: <ned.freed@mrochek.com>
X-Original-To: yam@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: yam@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6B4F5131093 for <yam@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 4 Mar 2019 09:31:22 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=mrochek.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id TScBU0GaINr1 for <yam@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 4 Mar 2019 09:31:20 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mauve.mrochek.com (mauve.mrochek.com [66.218.59.24]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1D07D13108C for <yam@ietf.org>; Mon, 4 Mar 2019 09:31:20 -0800 (PST)
Received: from dkim-sign.mauve.mrochek.com by mauve.mrochek.com (PMDF V6.1-1 #35243) id <01R3WD6ARYIO00T1SC@mauve.mrochek.com> for yam@ietf.org; Mon, 4 Mar 2019 09:26:14 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=mrochek.com; s=201712; t=1551720373; bh=OoJ0KZ36E3VEP3svw3pnkMrGIF9lU1dHlgE9bzHxUHk=; h=Cc:Date:From:Subject:In-reply-to:References:To:From; b=qXCFdl7fXz9jpmnL9OBMAZgSrmsnqD0K/iM8c6IR1db3uJRoxsIBjbadymNaYZp5A 7M7Th1D1dgmSiHAujTAMfczABSHfBk1SxWL0FdJOegQgtLMqjVox95grG25X+HARt3 1NZrUMe24KsEi3Ukv0Q1YSxqxy8hrxGv4/hvJLHg=
MIME-version: 1.0
Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit
Content-type: TEXT/PLAIN; CHARSET="us-ascii"; format="flowed"
Received: from mauve.mrochek.com by mauve.mrochek.com (PMDF V6.1-1 #35243) id <01R3W3IPXK4000004L@mauve.mrochek.com>; Mon, 4 Mar 2019 09:26:07 -0800 (PST)
Cc: RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>, john+ietf@jck.com, ned.freed@mrochek.com, mrose17@gmail.com, ben@nostrum.com, aamelnikov@fastmail.fm, adam@nostrum.com, tony@att.com, sm+ietf@elandsys.com, af13@protonmail.com, yam@ietf.org
Message-id: <01R3WD68QPDO00004L@mauve.mrochek.com>
Date: Mon, 04 Mar 2019 09:25:41 -0800
From: Ned Freed <ned.freed@mrochek.com>
In-reply-to: "Your message dated Mon, 04 Mar 2019 08:32:26 -0800" <8fda601c-8162-b9eb-3677-b8c732d22d58@bbiw.net>
References: <20190304153046.8443FB82AAA@rfc-editor.org> <8fda601c-8162-b9eb-3677-b8c732d22d58@bbiw.net>
To: Dave Crocker <dcrocker@bbiw.net>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/yam/GdRaCE4OEjuiAs_QK1Iu4ImP85w>
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Mon, 04 Mar 2019 11:07:07 -0800
Subject: Re: [yam] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC6152 (5646) {dkim-fail}
X-BeenThere: yam@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Yet Another Mail working group discussion list <yam.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/yam>, <mailto:yam-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/yam/>
List-Post: <mailto:yam@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:yam-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/yam>, <mailto:yam-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 04 Mar 2019 17:31:22 -0000
Agreed; the current text is correct and this should be rejected. Ned > Please reject. > The existing text is correct. It might have helped for the language to > be a bit simpler, but it is correct. > Reduced to its essence, the current language means: > The usual SMTP data-stuffing algorithm applies, so that some content > does not prematurely terminate the transfer of content. > d/ > On 3/4/2019 7:30 AM, RFC Errata System wrote: > > The following errata report has been submitted for RFC6152, > > "SMTP Service Extension for 8-bit MIME Transport". > > > > -------------------------------------- > > You may review the report below and at: > > http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid5646 > > > > -------------------------------------- > > Type: Technical > > Reported by: HE Zhixiang <af13@protonmail.com> > > > > Section: 3 > > > > Original Text > > ------------- > > Naturally, the usual SMTP data-stuffing algorithm applies, so that a > > content that contains the five-character sequence of > > <CR> <LF> <DOT> <CR> <LF> > > or a content that begins with the three-character sequence of > > <DOT> <CR> <LF> > > does not prematurely terminate the transfer of the content. > > > > Corrected Text > > -------------- > > Naturally, the usual SMTP data-stuffing algorithm applies, so that a > > content that contains the five-character sequence of > > <CR> <LF> <DOT> <CR> <LF> > > or a content that begins with the three-character sequence of > > <DOT> <CR> <LF> > > would prematurely terminate the transfer of the content. > > > > Notes > > ----- > > RFC 5321, section 4.5.2: > > Without some provision for data transparency, the character sequence "<CRLF>.<CRLF>" ends the mail text and cannot be sent by the user. > > > > Instructions: > > ------------- > > This erratum is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please > > use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or > > rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party > > can log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary. > > > > -------------------------------------- > > RFC6152 (draft-ietf-yam-rfc1652bis-03) > > -------------------------------------- > > Title : SMTP Service Extension for 8-bit MIME Transport > > Publication Date : March 2011 > > Author(s) : J. Klensin, N. Freed, M. Rose, D. Crocker, Ed. > > Category : INTERNET STANDARD > > Source : Yet Another Mail > > Area : Applications > > Stream : IETF > > Verifying Party : IESG > > > -- > Dave Crocker > Brandenburg InternetWorking > bbiw.net
- [yam] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC6152 (5646) RFC Errata System
- Re: [yam] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC6152 (56… Dave Crocker
- Re: [yam] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC6152 (56… Dave Crocker
- Re: [yam] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC6152 (56… Ned Freed
- Re: [yam] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC6152 (56… John C Klensin
- Re: [yam] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC6152 (56… S Moonesamy
- Re: [yam] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC6152 (56… Dave Crocker
- Re: [yam] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC6152 (56… John C Klensin