Re: [yam] Another thought on the template
Alexey Melnikov <alexey.melnikov@isode.com> Fri, 14 August 2009 15:19 UTC
Return-Path: <alexey.melnikov@isode.com>
X-Original-To: yam@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: yam@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C6C4328C18D for <yam@core3.amsl.com>; Fri, 14 Aug 2009 08:19:24 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.477
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.477 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.122, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Le0M9xekLlSK for <yam@core3.amsl.com>; Fri, 14 Aug 2009 08:19:24 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rufus.isode.com (rufus.isode.com [62.3.217.251]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7791028C17A for <yam@ietf.org>; Fri, 14 Aug 2009 08:19:10 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [172.16.2.183] (shiny.isode.com [62.3.217.250]) by rufus.isode.com (submission channel) via TCP with ESMTPA id <SoWAcAB9YV5w@rufus.isode.com>; Fri, 14 Aug 2009 16:19:13 +0100
Message-ID: <4A858058.7040605@isode.com>
Date: Fri, 14 Aug 2009 16:18:48 +0100
From: Alexey Melnikov <alexey.melnikov@isode.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.7.12) Gecko/20050915
X-Accept-Language: en-us, en
To: John C Klensin <john-ietf@jck.com>
References: <ECF183775FE757FAA8EC5620@PST.JCK.COM>
In-Reply-To: <ECF183775FE757FAA8EC5620@PST.JCK.COM>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: yam@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [yam] Another thought on the template
X-BeenThere: yam@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Yet Another Mail working group discussion list <yam.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/yam>, <mailto:yam-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/yam>
List-Post: <mailto:yam@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:yam-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/yam>, <mailto:yam-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 14 Aug 2009 15:19:24 -0000
John C Klensin wrote: >After thinking about this a little more, and reflecting back on >the long period of discussions before we moved into a charter >proposal, I think that we need to stay tightly focused on >objectives and avoid having things in the template (or >elsewhere) that might be distractions. Put more specifically: > >The YAM objective, reflected in the Charter, is only to move >documents from Draft to Full Standard, not to invent and examine >other requirements. Let's reinforce that, and remind WG >participants, by including the relevant requirements excerpts >from 2026 in the template and by removing anything, such as the >interoperability statement pointer, that is not part of this >stage of advancement in maturity level. > > John, while you are correct as far as process is concerned, most IESG members are at least curious about the implementation report. So actually having the pointer would help me.
- Re: [yam] Another thought on the template Alexey Melnikov
- Re: [yam] Another thought on the template Alexey Melnikov
- [yam] Another thought on the template John C Klensin