[yam] ABNF Loose Ends

Sabahattin Gucukoglu <mail@sabahattin-gucukoglu.com> Mon, 12 July 2010 00:37 UTC

Return-Path: <mail@sabahattin-gucukoglu.com>
X-Original-To: yam@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: yam@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B54D03A65A6 for <yam@core3.amsl.com>; Sun, 11 Jul 2010 17:37:45 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 0.962
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.962 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, HOST_EQ_MODEMCABLE=1.368, HOST_MISMATCH_COM=0.311, RCVD_IN_PBL=0.905, RCVD_IN_SORBS_DUL=0.877, RDNS_DYNAMIC=0.1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id O85d2CGke89z for <yam@core3.amsl.com>; Sun, 11 Jul 2010 17:37:30 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from Mintaka.sabahattin-gucukoglu.com (Mintaka.sabahattin-gucukoglu.com [IPv6:2002:adcb:c9c7::1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 465143A6830 for <yam@ietf.org>; Sun, 11 Jul 2010 17:37:17 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from Mintaka.sabahattin-gucukoglu.com ([::ffff:127.0.0.1]:39799) by Mintaka.sabahattin-gucukoglu.com with [XMail 1.27 ESMTP Server] id <S1127D> for <yam@ietf.org> from <mail@sabahattin-gucukoglu.com>; Mon, 12 Jul 2010 01:37:12 +0100
Received: from [192.168.1.3] (cpc4-dals7-0-0-cust274.hari.cable.virginmedia.com [62.31.227.19]) (using SMTP over TLS) by Mintaka (tmda-ofmipd) with ESMTP; Mon, 12 Jul 2010 01:37:11 +0100
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Date: Mon, 12 Jul 2010 01:37:08 +0100
Message-Id: <EB96C6F0-5CDB-40A9-914C-20131E4F3312@sabahattin-gucukoglu.com>
To: yam@ietf.org
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1081)
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1081)
X-Delivery-Agent: TMDA/1.1.12-kg2 (Pluto)
From: Sabahattin Gucukoglu <mail@sabahattin-gucukoglu.com>
X-Primary-Address: mail@sabahattin-gucukoglu.com
Subject: [yam] ABNF Loose Ends
X-BeenThere: yam@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Sabahattin Gucukoglu <mail-dated-1281487032.d1a416@sabahattin-gucukoglu.com>
List-Id: Yet Another Mail working group discussion list <yam.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/yam>, <mailto:yam-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/yam>
List-Post: <mailto:yam@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:yam-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/yam>, <mailto:yam-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 12 Jul 2010 00:37:46 -0000

I'm afraid I've not been as on top as I'd've liked with regard to the pre-evaluation review.  Please forgive if these were mentioned before but ...

In seeking an explanation of local-part quoting, I had to consult ABNF rules in RFC 5321 more carefully, and noticed that there is a definition of String that doesn't appear to be used.  I also note that "atext" is declared but not defined (no reference to RFC 5322) even though atom is defined clearly.

Cheers,
Sabahattin