Re: [yam] scheduling conflicts for upcoming YAM meeting
John C Klensin <john-ietf@jck.com> Mon, 31 August 2009 15:27 UTC
Return-Path: <john-ietf@jck.com>
X-Original-To: yam@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: yam@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C519C28C2D3 for <yam@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 31 Aug 2009 08:27:45 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.52
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.52 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.079, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id AeiE-W-SbTu9 for <yam@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 31 Aug 2009 08:27:40 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from bs.jck.com (ns.jck.com [209.187.148.211]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 62B5128C2DA for <yam@ietf.org>; Mon, 31 Aug 2009 08:26:50 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=localhost) by bs.jck.com with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1Mi8ma-000H5A-CO; Mon, 31 Aug 2009 11:27:00 -0400
Date: Mon, 31 Aug 2009 11:26:59 -0400
From: John C Klensin <john-ietf@jck.com>
To: Tony Hansen <tony@att.com>, Yet Another Mail Working Group <yam@ietf.org>
Message-ID: <46B9F4421DD401733CB19BCF@PST.JCK.COM>
In-Reply-To: <4A9BE125.40906@att.com>
References: <4A9BE125.40906@att.com>
X-Mailer: Mulberry/4.0.8 (Win32)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
Subject: Re: [yam] scheduling conflicts for upcoming YAM meeting
X-BeenThere: yam@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Yet Another Mail working group discussion list <yam.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/yam>, <mailto:yam-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/yam>
List-Post: <mailto:yam@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:yam-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/yam>, <mailto:yam-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 31 Aug 2009 15:27:45 -0000
--On Monday, August 31, 2009 10:41 -0400 Tony Hansen <tony@att.com> wrote: > It's time to schedule the YAM meeting for Hiroshima. I'd > rather get this done early rather than late in the cycle like > last time. What conflicts does everyone want us to avoid? > > My initial list is: > > APP apparea > APP httpbis > APP idnabis > APP morg > APP ogpx > APP sieve > APP vcarddav > SEC sasl > SEC dkim > > Any other conflicts we should avoid? EAI (which is directly mail-related). john
- [yam] scheduling conflicts for upcoming YAM meeti… Tony Hansen
- Re: [yam] scheduling conflicts for upcoming YAM m… John C Klensin
- Re: [yam] scheduling conflicts for upcoming YAM m… Dave CROCKER
- Re: [yam] scheduling conflicts for upcoming YAM m… Alexey Melnikov
- [yam] scheduling conflicts for upcoming YAM meeti… Tony Hansen
- Re: [yam] scheduling conflicts for upcoming YAM m… Barry Leiba